Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
908 bytes removed ,  17:02, September 13, 2019
Line 51: Line 51:  
David Gorski at Scienceblogs wrote about atheist/skeptic organizations and financial mismanagement:
 
David Gorski at Scienceblogs wrote about atheist/skeptic organizations and financial mismanagement:
 
{{cquote|In any case, this makes me wonder: What is it about rationalist/skeptic groups that make them seemingly have such a hard time running their organizations well from a financial standpoint? After all, just a couple of months ago the Center for Inquiry (CFI) sent out letters desperately begging for more contributions. The reason was that CFI had one large benefactor whose yearly contribution funded approximately 20-25% of the yearly CFI budget. As clueless as I may be about finances, even I know that you don’t use such donations to run the operating expenses of an organization, because you can’t count on them from year to year and it’s too big a chunk. You use this money for special short-term projects and a rainy day fund. Not surprisingly, when this mysterious donor stopped donating earlier this year, suddently CFI was in deep doo-doo from a financial standpoint, prompting the desperate plea for donations and deep budget cuts. I realize that the down economy has played havoc with many nonprofit and charitable organizations, but these issues with skeptical organizations seem to go beyond just that.<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/10/24/richard-dawkins-sues-josh-timonen/ Richard Dawkins sues Josh Timonen], Posted by David Gorski on October 24, 2010</ref>}}
 
{{cquote|In any case, this makes me wonder: What is it about rationalist/skeptic groups that make them seemingly have such a hard time running their organizations well from a financial standpoint? After all, just a couple of months ago the Center for Inquiry (CFI) sent out letters desperately begging for more contributions. The reason was that CFI had one large benefactor whose yearly contribution funded approximately 20-25% of the yearly CFI budget. As clueless as I may be about finances, even I know that you don’t use such donations to run the operating expenses of an organization, because you can’t count on them from year to year and it’s too big a chunk. You use this money for special short-term projects and a rainy day fund. Not surprisingly, when this mysterious donor stopped donating earlier this year, suddently CFI was in deep doo-doo from a financial standpoint, prompting the desperate plea for donations and deep budget cuts. I realize that the down economy has played havoc with many nonprofit and charitable organizations, but these issues with skeptical organizations seem to go beyond just that.<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/10/24/richard-dawkins-sues-josh-timonen/ Richard Dawkins sues Josh Timonen], Posted by David Gorski on October 24, 2010</ref>}}
−
  −
== Dawkins' Twitter post about a video comparing feminism to radical Islam ==
  −
  −
Stephanie Zvan is an atheist blogger at [[Freethought Blogs]]. She wrote an open letter to the Center for Inquiry about the events surrounding the Dawkins' Twitter post relating to a video comparing feminism to radical Islam that "CFI now has a harassment denialist on its board, a harassment denialist who has tied his denialism to his work at your organization."<ref>[http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamonds/2016/01/29/dawkins-goes-denialist-an-open-letter-to-the-cfi-board/ Dawkins Goes Denialist: An Open Letter to the CFI Board] by Stephanie Zvan  at [[Freethought Blogs]]</ref>
  −
  −
For more information, please see: [[Richard Dawkins#Dawkins' disinvitation to speak at a skeptics conference due to a feminism/Islam controversy|Dawkins' disinvitation to speak at a skeptics conference due to a feminism/Islam controversy]]
      
==Center for Inquiry's affiliated programs==
 
==Center for Inquiry's affiliated programs==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,415

edits

Navigation menu