SkipCaptcha
339
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 480:
Line 480: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:26, September 18, 2019
, 16:26, September 18, 2019no edit summary
:The part about dinosaurs was intentional, and there is strong evidence that they lived together. CP does not dogmatically accept evolution to the exclusion of other scientifically and historically valid views. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:06, 6 December 2018 (EST)
:The part about dinosaurs was intentional, and there is strong evidence that they lived together. CP does not dogmatically accept evolution to the exclusion of other scientifically and historically valid views. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 21:06, 6 December 2018 (EST)
==Bias in coverage==
Would it not be good to have a section in this article devoted to Wikipedia's bias of coverage in its topics? This could say that there tends to be a big emphasis on popular media culture topics in Wikipedia - as Wikipedia itself points out, the article on [[Coronation Street]] is longer than the article on [[Tony Blair]]. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 12:26, 18 September 2019 (EDT)