Changes

:::Responding to your further post, even though my previous comments above were not in answer to that, they probably do go some way towards answering it.  I wouldn't rule out Lithium having a natural explanation, if that were compatible with the overall supernatural beginning.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:07, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

:::Responding to your further post, even though my previous comments above were not in answer to that, they probably do go some way towards answering it.  I wouldn't rule out Lithium having a natural explanation, if that were compatible with the overall supernatural beginning.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:07, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

:::OK, I follow you.  So how do you decide which observations have a natural explanation, and which have a supernatural explanation?--[[User:Mackronking2|Mackronking2]] 02:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

:::OK, I follow you.  So how do you decide which observations have a natural explanation, and which have a supernatural explanation? After all, the Lithium abundance *can* be predicted using the laws of physics (that's part of the Big Bang theory).  It seems to me that if a natural theory can indeed explain the observation, then maybe the supernatural intervention must have come even earlier in time.  --[[User:Mackronking2|Mackronking2]] 02:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

== Young earth creationist view ==

== Young earth creationist view ==