Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: +
→Debate and rhetorical tactics: info added
#Resorts to taking what a conservative opponent says and deliberately and dishonestly twisting it out of context to suit the liberal's own argument.
#Resorts to taking what a conservative opponent says and deliberately and dishonestly twisting it out of context to suit the liberal's own argument.
#Resorts to bringing religion into a political discussion to use against a conservative opponent when the liberal feels they are losing the argument.
#Resorts to bringing religion into a political discussion to use against a conservative opponent when the liberal feels they are losing the argument.
#Frequently use a person's age, gender, sexual preference or race/skin color as shields against criticism of that person's misguided political/ideological beliefs and poor life choices (e.g. [[Greta Thunberg]]), under the belief that that person should be immune from criticism due to age/gender/sexuality/race.
#Like to use the phrase "reflects poorly on the site" when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia.<ref>do a search on [[Special:Search|"reflects poorly"]]</ref>
#Like to use the phrase "reflects poorly on the site" when talking about the liberal articles on Conservapedia.<ref>do a search on [[Special:Search|"reflects poorly"]]</ref>
#Uses the term "controversial" to describe what he opposes (e.g., [[classroom prayer]]), but not to describe what he supports (e.g., [[theory of evolution]])
#Uses the term "controversial" to describe what he opposes (e.g., [[classroom prayer]]), but not to describe what he supports (e.g., [[theory of evolution]])