SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,074:
Line 1,074: + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Atheistic Troll: curiouser and curiouser
User:Conservative, over the years you have announced countless projects, out-times, booklets, etc. - nothing ever came of it. For me, you are somewhat the "comic relief" of Conservapedia, so, please, do not take our interactions too seriously. I hope that quenches the tempest in the teapot. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:05, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
User:Conservative, over the years you have announced countless projects, out-times, booklets, etc. - nothing ever came of it. For me, you are somewhat the "comic relief" of Conservapedia, so, please, do not take our interactions too seriously. I hope that quenches the tempest in the teapot. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 19:05, 28 September 2019 (EDT)
:Well, this gets more confusing practically every day. Wikignome72 writes ("I asked another editor of the account [clearly referring to the Conservative account] to change the password ..." '''Another''' editor? This suggests the WGN is one of the editors of that account. But that would be sockpuppetry, which is clearly forbidden, and gets people banned instantly. So we have to assume WGN simply misspoke.
:And now WGN says, as though he is in close communication with the Cons people, that the number of Cons people is only 3, not 4. Perhaps it was hoped there would be 4 horseman of the [[User:Conservative]] account, but that this never occurred. Perhaps that 4th person, who was given the password but apparently never did anything, engaged in a bit of treachery and changed the password. Or perhaps the password change was actually done at the request of WGN, in order to keep him from being distracted while he (WGN) tackled some projects. Though I don't understand why the actions of the Cons folks would distract WGN. And WGN now appears to be tackling the same projects (atheism, atheism, atheism, New Zealand, and atheism), and with the same zeal and intensity, that the Cons's did.
:And it's possible that WGN's failure to simply reset the Cons password was because he had forgotten that he had admin privileges, or perhaps was never aware of this in the first place? Even though his user page has said, since 00:06 on 26 September, that he has them?
:So it's all very confusing. I don't know what the relationship is between WGN and the Cons folks, or the relationship among the Cons folks. But it appears that the number of Cons folks is 3, not 4.
:By the way, I don't normally follow Richard Dawkins, or all the atheist material the the Cons folks, and WGN, write, but today I just happened to look at [https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=atheism,atheist,Richard%20Dawkins,agnostic,agnosticism a Google trends page]. And I thought "Mission accomplished!", depending on what the mission is. I can't figure out what the surveys mean. They seem to be treating Richard Dawkins as though he, personally, is a religious stance. But the [http://www.sneps.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/jssr_15101.pdf pre-2043] page certainly suggests that something has been a smashing success!!
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 20:40, 28 September 2019 (EDT)