368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 96:
Line 96: − + − +
→Criticisms
''See also criticism in [[Noah's Ark#Controversy|Noah's Ark]] and [[Flood Geology#Controversy|Flood Geology]].
''See also criticism in [[Noah's Ark#Controversy|Noah's Ark]] and [[Flood Geology#Controversy|Flood Geology]].
Critics question the plausibility of keeping all land creatures on one boat.
Critics question the plausability of keeping all land creatures on one 450ft boat, they also question that the world could be repopulated with so few specimens (inbreeding).
They also question how the world could be repopulated with so few specimens (inbreeding).
They point out that none of the civilizations that existed between 3000 B.C. and 2000 B.C. reported a destruction of this scale (most flood stories speak of much earlier dates), but the [[Minoan]] civilization on Crete, was destroyed by volcanic activity and floods around 1450 B.C., leading some scholars to believe this was the source of Middle Eastern flood accounts.
Critics of the global flood suggest that the flood accounts are unrelated accounts of local floods, or stories influenced by the arrival of missionaries.
Critics of the global flood suggest that the flood accounts are unrelated accounts of local floods, or stories influenced by the arrival of missionaries.