Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 108: Line 108:  
Isn't that the creationist definition of '''macro'''evolution? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:29, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Isn't that the creationist definition of '''macro'''evolution? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:29, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:See the second-last dot-point on [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996/84/ this page], although read the start of the page to put it in context.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:42, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:See the second-last dot-point on [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996/84/ this page], although read the start of the page to put it in context.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:42, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Hominids vs apes==
 +
 +
My recent edit, a single word change, was reverted, and I'm not clear as to why.  The article currently reads that humans evolved from ancient apes.  This is a misleading statement.  My phrasing was that humans evolved from ancient hominids.  Of course, humans, hominids, as well as gorillas, chimpanzees, and orangutans are all "apes", but no biologist suggests that modern humans evolved directly from other extant groups of apes, but that we descend from the now extinct hominid branch.  RSchlafly, can you give a compelling reason why the edit was reverted?  [[User:JohnSmith|JohnSmith]] 14:19, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
82

edits

Navigation menu