SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,022:
Line 1,022: − − ==References== − {{reflist}} Line 1,091:
Line 1,088: + + +
Move the references to the end. This is the price one pays for having references in one's talk page. Probably not a good idea, but it's too late to change it noe.
(Swiss neutrality has insured that Switzerland is not a landmine-infested area needing the assistance of rats)
(Swiss neutrality has insured that Switzerland is not a landmine-infested area needing the assistance of rats)
== SamHB vs. User: Conservative. SamHB badly loses again ==
== SamHB vs. User: Conservative. SamHB badly loses again ==
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
==References==
{{reflist}}