| | Trey Parker and Matt Stone have produced two official video games under Ubisoft: ''South Park: The Stick of Truth'' and ''South Park: The Fractured But Whole''. Yes, they're vulgar, but they do make fun of political correctness (the second game actually has the player learn a "Microagression" fighting technique from PC Principal where they get a free hit on an enemy if they say anything that could be perceived as bigoted), environmentalism, feminism, gun control, among other things. They make fun of the idea that the police are racist by having them worship a demon that specifically targets blacks for consumption in the game (this is obviously sarcastic). They make fun of identity politics in allowing the character to choose their gender, race/ethnicity, and religion, and then engaging in battle with rednecks who will beat you up no matter what you choose! Also, when the gender is chosen, the game implicitly satirizes the concept of transgenderism, especially considering the player is allowed to return to the counselor at any time to change their gender. The second game is arguably more conservative than the first (or maybe that's just me; I was still apolitical and a progressive liberal by default when I was playing the first one), but they're both undeniably conservative, or at least libertarian. I just don't want to see them end up in "Worst Liberal" like the South Park movie. | | Trey Parker and Matt Stone have produced two official video games under Ubisoft: ''South Park: The Stick of Truth'' and ''South Park: The Fractured But Whole''. Yes, they're vulgar, but they do make fun of political correctness (the second game actually has the player learn a "Microagression" fighting technique from PC Principal where they get a free hit on an enemy if they say anything that could be perceived as bigoted), environmentalism, feminism, gun control, among other things. They make fun of the idea that the police are racist by having them worship a demon that specifically targets blacks for consumption in the game (this is obviously sarcastic). They make fun of identity politics in allowing the character to choose their gender, race/ethnicity, and religion, and then engaging in battle with rednecks who will beat you up no matter what you choose! Also, when the gender is chosen, the game implicitly satirizes the concept of transgenderism, especially considering the player is allowed to return to the counselor at any time to change their gender. The second game is arguably more conservative than the first (or maybe that's just me; I was still apolitical and a progressive liberal by default when I was playing the first one), but they're both undeniably conservative, or at least libertarian. I just don't want to see them end up in "Worst Liberal" like the South Park movie. |