Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
vandal alert
Line 11: Line 11:  
:"Anti" is the correct prefix, "Un" as in the question is not.  It is pretty simple.  Many, many events can be described many different ways (see, for example, the Civil War).  Some of this depends on who writes the history (you know, the victors), and some depends on modes of analysis and perspective (e.g., if a round of union-busting creates a "freer market", the lefty would see the lower wages and lost jobs as bad, the righty would see the improved mobility of capital and potential for profit as good).  The "creators of CP" see WP as not taking the pro-American view on issues.  As an example, when we "went" to Panama and "retrieved" Manuel Noriega, the story from the perspective of a Panamanian family who lost a relative in the "skirmish" would be very different from the perspective of US interests that thought Noriega was not doing his job well.  CP would prefer to see the latter, "pro-American" viewpoint emphasized.  Basically the same thing goes for the CP viewpoint that WP is "anti-Christian". [[User:Human|Human]] 13:28, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:"Anti" is the correct prefix, "Un" as in the question is not.  It is pretty simple.  Many, many events can be described many different ways (see, for example, the Civil War).  Some of this depends on who writes the history (you know, the victors), and some depends on modes of analysis and perspective (e.g., if a round of union-busting creates a "freer market", the lefty would see the lower wages and lost jobs as bad, the righty would see the improved mobility of capital and potential for profit as good).  The "creators of CP" see WP as not taking the pro-American view on issues.  As an example, when we "went" to Panama and "retrieved" Manuel Noriega, the story from the perspective of a Panamanian family who lost a relative in the "skirmish" would be very different from the perspective of US interests that thought Noriega was not doing his job well.  CP would prefer to see the latter, "pro-American" viewpoint emphasized.  Basically the same thing goes for the CP viewpoint that WP is "anti-Christian". [[User:Human|Human]] 13:28, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
   −
Don't get me wrong, I love America. However, Conservapedia loves it so much that they call a neutral source like Wikipedia biased.
+
Don't get me wrong, I love America. However, Conservapedia loves it so much that they call a neutral source like Wikipedia biased. {{unsigned|Darwindude}}
 +
:Me too, really.  But what are you saying?
2,014

edits

Navigation menu