SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 931:
Line 931: + Line 1,099:
Line 1,100: + + + +
no edit summary
Please address both the writing and footnoting styles of the three articles. Also, address any quote box differences. In addition, address any differences in points of view.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 11 April 2019 (EDT)
Please address both the writing and footnoting styles of the three articles. Also, address any quote box differences. In addition, address any differences in points of view.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:01, 11 April 2019 (EDT)
:Gosh. He didn't reply, either about the writing styles or about the footnoting styles. Perhaps this is because he considers those questions incredibly childish. Perhaps he's got better things to do. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:21, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
===Multiple personalities, part 1===
===Multiple personalities, part 1===
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
:::Warning!! I have not promised email confidentiality to anyone other than the person who I believed at the time was the sole owner of the User:Conservative CP account. Any mail that I get that appears (based on, for example, its topicality to the present discussion) to be from Wikignome72, I will assume to be from Wikignome72, and will be subject to being made public. If it comes from one of the email addresses of the Conservative group, I will simply assume that someone in that group gave his email password to Wikignome72, and that the latter is posting it on his own. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:18, 29 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
::::Eisenhower had many good points indeed but it should be understood that he was not a "fighting general" in the mold of Patton, Montgomery or Rommel. He was a superb administrator and took well informed strategic decisions that were presented to him. He had little actual battlefield experience, a great man and leader perhaps but certainly no master tactician.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 08:40, 30 September 2019 (EDT)
It's pretty obvious by now that this booklet never existed, and was a fantasy all along. Why the Cons folks thought they were fooling anyone is a mystery. But it doesn't matter any more. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:21, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
==Well, that was fast!==
You, wikignome72, put up an edit, and then vaped it ONE MINUTE LATER! At 23:38, 11 October 2019. Your behavior gets more similar every day to that of our dear departed friends in the Cons account. By the way, now that they are gone, I'll have a few things to say about them soon. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:21, 11 October 2019 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}