Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Comments: Not to do with homosexuality
Line 41: Line 41:     
Brian and Philip....did you not see the other article on Homosexuality?  We are not talking about doing away with anything other than this redundant article, misnamed.  Of course anything in the present example, not included there, would be merged. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
 
Brian and Philip....did you not see the other article on Homosexuality?  We are not talking about doing away with anything other than this redundant article, misnamed.  Of course anything in the present example, not included there, would be merged. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 20:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Apart from a reference in the first sentence, what does the [[Homo]] article have to do with homosexuality?  Most of [[Homo]] is actually talking about [[homo sapiens]], which is why I'm suggesting merging the relevant parts of this to that.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:11, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
    
=Kept=
 
=Kept=
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu