Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,075
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
no edit summary
George Eliason is an American journalist that lives and works in [[Donbass]]. He has been interviewed by and provided analysis for RT, the [[BBC]], and Press-TV. His articles have been published in the Security Assistance Monitor, Washingtons Blog, OpedNews, the Saker, RT, Global Research, and RINF, and the Greanville Post among others. He has been cited and republished by various academic blogs including Defending History, Michael Hudson, SWEDHR, Counterpunch, the Justice Integrity Project, among others.
==Jaunary 2017 findings==
'''George Eliason, ''Washingtonsblog:'' Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart- Say Hello to Fancy Bear.''' investigated.<ref>https://washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-say-hello-fancy-bear-2.html</ref>
'''George Eliason, ''Washingtonsblog:'' Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart- Say Hello to Fancy Bear.''' investigated.<ref>https://washingtonsblog.com/2017/01/crowdstrikes-russian-hacking-story-fell-apart-say-hello-fancy-bear-2.html</ref>
:*In the wake of the JAR-16-20296 dated December 29, 2016 about hacking and influencing the 2016 election, the need for real evidence is clear. The joint report adds nothing substantial to the October 7th report. It relies on proofs provided by the cyber security firm '''[[Crowdstrike]]''' that is clearly not on par with intelligence findings or evidence. At the top of the report is an “as is” statement showing this.
:*In the wake of the JAR-16-20296 dated December 29, 2016 about hacking and influencing the 2016 election, the need for real evidence is clear. The joint report adds nothing substantial to the October 7th report. It relies on proofs provided by the cyber security firm '''[[Crowdstrike]]''' that is clearly not on par with intelligence findings or evidence. At the top of the report is an “as is” statement showing this.