1,267
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 317:
Line 317: + + +
Debate: 15 questions for evolutionists (view source)
Revision as of 04:21, October 13, 2019
, 04:21, October 13, 2019→Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science?
===What a creationist would reply===
===What a creationist would reply===
How easy is it to postulate a conspiracy theory after the fact? It's like Holocaust denial, or even the conspiracy theories about 9/11. How has this conspiracy theory become mainstream, widely accepted by both the left and the right? I suppose this is what we get for allowing secular humanism, a by-product of cultural Marxism and vice versa, to gain so much traction, so much power.
Evolutionism is such an anti-religious ideology. You said we can't observe the past. You're right. How convenient. No one's disingenuous here but the godless evolutionists. If you were genuine, evolution would at least be a branch of history rather than science. It would still be historically revisionist, but it would be something. ---BernieandTrumpFan
==Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?==
==Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?==