Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + +
no edit summary
::Inviting Erdogan while U.S. troops have to withdraw under less than honorable conditions is a kowtow to him. Americans had to withdraw from Vietnam, too, but Nixon wouldn't have invited Ho-Chi-Minh to Washington. And Erdogan and his entourage did behave badly last time, there is zero reason to invite him a second time. It would be a nightmare for the conservatives and for America and for the West as a whole. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 16:34, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
::Inviting Erdogan while U.S. troops have to withdraw under less than honorable conditions is a kowtow to him. Americans had to withdraw from Vietnam, too, but Nixon wouldn't have invited Ho-Chi-Minh to Washington. And Erdogan and his entourage did behave badly last time, there is zero reason to invite him a second time. It would be a nightmare for the conservatives and for America and for the West as a whole. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 16:34, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
:::"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These words were in opposition to slavery back then and are in opposition to Erdogan now. If Erdogan is invited to Washington under these circumstances, the Republican party is finished. Is that the hidden aim? --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
:::"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These words were in opposition to slavery back then and are in opposition to Erdogan now. If Erdogan is invited to Washington under these circumstances, the Republican party is finished. Is that the hidden aim? --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
::::How many rabid pro-abortion world leaders have been invited to the White House? (answer: too many to count) How about those who support euthanasia or who support restrictions on free speech and religious freedom? (again, too many to count) Trump's being a realist, not some purist who thinks it's the U.S.'s obligation to embark on a worldwide crusade to rid the world of all dictators (funny, that liberal/neocon crusade never opposes the many leaders who support denying the unborn the right to live). Trump's unwillingness to go on a moral crusade against an medium-sized country on the other side of the world is one of the main reasons he won in 2016. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:58, 14 October 2019 (EDT)