Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 92:
Line 92: +
→Remark on Ecclesiastes
::And it's anti-stupid, i.e. atheist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 19:30, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
::And it's anti-stupid, i.e. atheist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 19:30, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
:::The book is unique in that it appears to be written by one author with perhaps the exception of the second epilogue. That epilogue was perhaps a compromise towards the religious authorities to get it into the cannon but it nevertheless rightfully belongs to the book because ... ''no spolier'': If one has enough time one should read it on one weekend. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 14:11, 15 October 2019 (EDT)
:::The book is unique in that it appears to be written by one author with perhaps the exception of the second epilogue. That epilogue was perhaps a compromise towards the religious authorities to get it into the cannon but it nevertheless rightfully belongs to the book because ... ''no spolier'': If one has enough time one should read it on one weekend. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 14:11, 15 October 2019 (EDT)
::::That's a load of BS. Most books of the Bible have a single human writer, and the content of Ecclesiastes is unified and, thus, doesn't contain compromises (which also suggests it wasn't God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 14:43, 15 October 2019 (EDT)