Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 319: Line 319:  
How easy is it to postulate a conspiracy theory after the fact? It's like Holocaust denial, or even the conspiracy theories about 9/11. How has this conspiracy theory become mainstream, widely accepted by both the left and the right? I suppose this is what we get for allowing secular humanism, a by-product of cultural Marxism and vice versa, to gain so much traction, so much power.
 
How easy is it to postulate a conspiracy theory after the fact? It's like Holocaust denial, or even the conspiracy theories about 9/11. How has this conspiracy theory become mainstream, widely accepted by both the left and the right? I suppose this is what we get for allowing secular humanism, a by-product of cultural Marxism and vice versa, to gain so much traction, so much power.
   −
Evolutionism is such an anti-religious ideology. You said we can't observe the past. You're right. How convenient. No one's disingenuous here but the godless evolutionists. If you were genuine, evolution would at least be a branch of history rather than science. It would still be historically revisionist, but it would be something. ---BernieandTrumpFan
+
Evolutionism is such an anti-religious ideology. You said we can't observe the past. You're right. How convenient. No one's disingenuous here but the godless evolutionists. If you were genuine, evolution would at least be a branch of history rather than science. It would still be historically revisionist, but it would be something. [[User:BernieandTrumpFan|BernieandTrumpFan]] ([[User talk:BernieandTrumpFan|talk]]) 00:39, 25 October 2019 (EDT)
    
==Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?==
 
==Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes?==

Navigation menu