16
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 268:
Line 268: − I am a scientist who has done a study which shows that mankind is incapable of determining whether there will be global warming. My findings, the summary of which follows, knocks the foundation out from under those who predict warming. − − Essentially, it shows that the warming "experts" are unable to accurately predict tomorrow's temperature. I compared predictions of the National Weather Service to actual outcomes for next-day temps, and found that the "experts" were right only 11% of the time. I also found that if, instead of using their education, experience, software, supercomputers, and satellites, they had merely said tomorrow's temp will be the same as today's, they would have been right 16% of the time-- a considerable improvement. − − The conclusion of my study is that, since the "experts" can only predict tomorrow's temp with 11% accuracy, they can't predict the temp 36,000 times farther out into the future. − − My study isn't published yet, so sorry, I can't provide a reference. Earl100.
Debate:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it? (view source)
Revision as of 19:59, May 13, 2007
, 19:59, May 13, 2007→References
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>