Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
775 bytes added ,  22:20, May 13, 2007
Line 31: Line 31:     
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should definitely be putting across our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradict Christianity must be considered false.  This page should also contain evidence that Christianity and not Islam is the one true faith.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa
 
Conservapedia shouldn't be biased in a bad way, but we should definitely be putting across our point of view.  It is obvious that Jesus was the son of G-d, and so any parts of Islam which contradict Christianity must be considered false.  This page should also contain evidence that Christianity and not Islam is the one true faith.  Surely we should not shy away from speaking the truth!!! -Mmeelliissssaa
 +
 +
Its obvious that Jesus was the son of God - that is in sense that Jesus is part of triad that is comprised of 3 equal parts, hence Jesus is God. Really! It was not even obvious to early Christians that this was the case. - anyone aware of the history of Christianity is aware of this. I suggest you Google "the Arian crisis" to find out more. If You mean that Jesus is the son of God, and the word son defines his rank with respect to God - that is less than, and seperate from, God, then you are outside the orthodox tradition, and are an Arian Christian. Not that I have a dog in this fight, I am an atheist. Yet your bias and question-begging(i,e. your conclusion that Islam must be false is based upon your presuppostion that your belief is true) needed to be attacked.
    
:Perhaps you would like to discuss one of our [[Debate topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:10, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps you would like to discuss one of our [[Debate topics]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:10, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
47

edits

Navigation menu