| Line 1,912: |
Line 1,912: |
| | | | |
| | :*'''CTH: Impeachment in The Courts – HJC vs DOJ Appellate Arguments Scheduled for November 12th.'''<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/07/impeachment-in-the-courts-hjc-vs-doj-appellate-arguments-scheduled-for-november-12th/#more-175601</ref> | | :*'''CTH: Impeachment in The Courts – HJC vs DOJ Appellate Arguments Scheduled for November 12th.'''<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/07/impeachment-in-the-courts-hjc-vs-doj-appellate-arguments-scheduled-for-november-12th/#more-175601</ref> |
| | + | :*If the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) loses this case in the DC Appellate Court, it means there is no constitutional foundation recognized to the “impeachment inquiry.” Without the constitutional recognition of the judicial branch then: |
| | + | ::*(a) Pelosi/Lawfare have to restart the process with a genuine House vote; or |
| | + | ::*(b) the ongoing impeachment process will have no recognized constitutional standing; and |
| | + | ::*(c) the Senate could ignore any House impeachment vote, cast without recognized constitutional standing. |
| | + | :*The HJC seeks judicial enforcement authority for their subpoenas so their targets cannot legally refuse to give testimony; and by extension the constitutional premise of the House process is affirmed. The premise for both fronts: |
| | + | ::*(1) document subpoena 6e grand jury material underlying the Mueller report, and |
| | + | ::*(2) testimony from White House Counsel [[Don McGahn]], is predicated on penetrating a constitutional firewall that exists within the [[separation of powers]]. |
| | + | ::*Under existing [[SCOTUS]] precedent, the White House can be compelled to deliver [[Executive Branch]] documents and testimony so long as an official legislative branch impeachment process is underway. |
| | + | :*If the DOJ can successfully argue the House has not followed the traditional and constitutional process that authorizes impeachment investigation; and allows the HJC to penetrate the separation of power firewall; it will be a major blow to the Lawfare scheme. |
| | + | :*A ruling in favor of the DOJ would invalidate the narrative of the House. |
| | + | :*A ruling in favor of the DOJ would also allow the Senate to dismiss any results from Schiff and Nadler’s investigation, because their process would not be predicated on constitutional provisions for impeachment. |
| | + | |
| | :*Tucker Carlson shines light on corrupt Obama-Judge Amy Berman Jackson who presides over Roger Stone trial beginning this week.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/tucker-carlson-shines-light-on-corrupt-obama-judge-amy-berman-jackson-who-should-be-disbarred-and-indicted-roger-stone-faces-crooked-activist-judge-this-week/</ref> | | :*Tucker Carlson shines light on corrupt Obama-Judge Amy Berman Jackson who presides over Roger Stone trial beginning this week.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/tucker-carlson-shines-light-on-corrupt-obama-judge-amy-berman-jackson-who-should-be-disbarred-and-indicted-roger-stone-faces-crooked-activist-judge-this-week/</ref> |
| | | | |