Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎Controversy: revised "prohomosex" to "prohomosexual" - linked polemicists
Line 40: Line 40:  
Another notable issue is the lack of any mention of Peter in the epistle, even among the many friends Paul greets in chapter 16, an absence many [[Protestants]] see as conspicuous,<ref>Barnes, ibid.</ref> as the [[Roman Catholic church]] holds Peter to have been the head of the church there, and first [[pope]].   
 
Another notable issue is the lack of any mention of Peter in the epistle, even among the many friends Paul greets in chapter 16, an absence many [[Protestants]] see as conspicuous,<ref>Barnes, ibid.</ref> as the [[Roman Catholic church]] holds Peter to have been the head of the church there, and first [[pope]].   
   −
A most recent controversy has been due to various attempts by prohomosex polemicists to portray [[Romans 1]] from unconditionally condemning male and female homoeroticism.
+
A most recent controversy has been due to various attempts by prohomosexual [[polemic]]ists to portray [[Romans 1]] from unconditionally condemning male and female homoeroticism.
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu