Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,703
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 66:
Line 66: − +
→Mueller investigation
The report's timeline of events defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them. Mueller never interviewed Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack.
The report's timeline of events defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them. Mueller never interviewed Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack.
Neither U.S. law enforcement nor intelligence officials ever examined DNC servers. Instead, they relied on the forensics of [[CrowdStrike]], a private contractor for the DNC founded by a Ukrainian oligarch that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler [[Christopher Steele]], also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignored.
Neither U.S. law enforcement nor intelligence officials ever examined DNC servers. The DOJ admitted that the FBI never saw the Crowdstrike Report on Russian hacking claim.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/15/doj-admits-fbi-never-saw-crowdstrike-report-on-dnc-russian-hacking-claim/</ref> Instead, they relied on the forensics of [[CrowdStrike]], a private contractor for the DNC founded by a Ukrainian oligarch that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiled by [[Christopher Steele]], also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignored.
The FBI allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.
The FBI allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.