| Line 567: |
Line 567: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |The highest-grossing feature in history, directed by liberal James Cameron, enforces many destructive messages, including [[environmentalism]], [[feminism]], and the absurd claim that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. To make matters worse, the protagonist forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline hints at endorsing environmental terrorism, which Cameron indicated that he himself supported. | + | |The second highest-grossing feature in history, directed by liberal James Cameron, enforces many destructive messages, including [[environmentalism]], [[feminism]], and the absurd claim that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. To make matters worse, the protagonist forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline hints at endorsing environmental terrorism, which Cameron indicated that he himself supported. |
| | |$760,507,625 | | |$760,507,625 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 573: |
Line 573: |
| | |2003 | | |2003 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Lots of coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and also the main plot involved a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''. | + | |This insult to the sacred holiday of Christmas features gratuitous coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and the main plot involving a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''. |
| | |$60 million | | |$60 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 705: |
Line 705: |
| | |2019 | | |2019 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |Set in 1995, the story follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. The movie promotes feminism, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a guy for mild flirts including "Smile for me" and stealing his stuff. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism and self-loathing racism by saying that she won't accept reviews about the movie from white men (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/</ref> as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/</ref><ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/</ref> | + | |Based on the eponymous Marvel Comics superheroine and set in 1995, the twenty-first installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. In contrast to the rest of the film series up to this point, ''Captain Marvel'' is explicitly feministic, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a man for mild flirts including "Smile for me" and stealing his belongings. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism and self-loathing racism by saying that she won't accept reviews about the movie from white men (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/</ref> as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/</ref><ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/</ref> |
| | |$1.128 billion | | |$1.128 billion |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 819: |
Line 819: |
| | |1969 | | |1969 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Glorifies every aspect of the hippie lifestyle, and is also Anti-American. Portrays conservatives as "bigoted" rednecks. | + | |This slice-of-life drama follows two drug-addicted motorcyclists who glorify every aspect of the hippie lifestyle. Conservatives incorrectly portrayed as racist rednecks. |
| | |$60 million | | |$60 million |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 867: |
Line 867: |
| | |2010 | | |2010 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |This film is pro-environmentalism and anti-capitalist on steroids. The main antagonist is a wealthy businessman, and he and his workers are demonized for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after "learning the animals' stories" and he even puts up a poster saying that anyone who violates the forest preservation will be fined at $1,000,000.00. | + | |This film is environmentalism and anticapitalistism on steroids. A wealthy businessman and his employees are the antagonists for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after "learning the animals' stories" and he even puts up a poster saying that anyone who violates the forest preservation will be fined at $1,000,000.00. |
| | |$35,000,000 | | |$35,000,000 |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''Get Out'' |
| | + | |2017 |
| | + | |R |
| | + | |This racist horror comedy-drama follows an African American man who discovers to his shock that his white American girlfriend's parents transplant the brains of white Americans into the bodies of African Americans as if to strip their victims of African American cultural identity. It presents a false dichotomy between black and white culture and discourages American ideals such as interracial and intercultural integration, all while accusing white Americans of wanting to eliminate instead of integrate all racial subcultures in the nation. |
| | + | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Ghostbusters'' (2016 remake) | | |''Ghostbusters'' (2016 remake) |
| Line 879: |
Line 885: |
| | |1953 | | |1953 |
| | |Not rated | | |Not rated |
| − | |Created by Ed Wood, widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it celebrates cross-dressing and transsexualism. | + | |Created by Ed Wood and widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it celebrates cross-dressing and transsexualism. |
| | |N/A | | |N/A |
| | |- | | |- |