Changes

:: What particular aspects of the article do you say ought be retained?  Or are you suggesting material for a new article?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 22:56, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:: What particular aspects of the article do you say ought be retained?  Or are you suggesting material for a new article?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 22:56, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::The article states what it is and gives a few well known examples. What's wrong with that?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:03, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::The article states what it is and gives a few well known examples. What's wrong with that?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:03, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::: As I explained above, the definition of deceit (other, perhaps than the legal definition) is a matter for a dictionary.  Further, the examples are a mere excuse for people to push particular barrows.  Examples or deceit are, by their very nature, contentious and have no place in an encyclopedia.

:::: As I explained above, the definition of deceit (other, perhaps than the legal definition) is a matter for a dictionary.  Further, the examples are a mere excuse for people to push particular barrows.  Examples of deceit are, by their very nature, contentious and have no place in an encyclopedia.

:::: Do you suggest the retention of any particular parts of the article or have any suggestions for the new article?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 23:12, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::: Do you suggest the retention of any particular parts of the article or have any suggestions for the new article?  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 23:12, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::I thought it covers the basic elements pretty good.  Of course we could always use other good examples, too.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:40, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::I thought it covers the basic elements pretty good.  Of course we could always use other good examples, too.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:40, 13 May 2007 (EDT)