Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Deceit (view source)

Revision as of 04:22, May 14, 2007

523 bytes added ,  04:22, May 14, 2007
Churchill example
Line 529: Line 529:     
I'd be willing to find another source for it (it was widely reported in the news and that site was just the first thing I found), but I'm not sure how this doesn't fit in with the theme of the article. If not, that's fine, but I'm just asking. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:14, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I'd be willing to find another source for it (it was widely reported in the news and that site was just the first thing I found), but I'm not sure how this doesn't fit in with the theme of the article. If not, that's fine, but I'm just asking. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:14, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I'm indifferent to this.  If there are better cites that really prove the deceit, then let's consider it.  My only concern is that the other listed items are deceits against the public, while this Churchill incident seems to be a private matter.  Also, in most of the other cases people embraced the deceit even knowing it was a lie.  I don't want to dilute the great examples we have with less significant examples.  Thanks and Godspeed to your fine efforts, Dan.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:22, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/159641"

Navigation menu