Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
674 bytes added ,  05:40, May 14, 2007
Line 554: Line 554:     
::*A small amount of tact and civility go much further than doing that (calling them as you see them) 100% of the time, no? I just cannot get over the bitterness of some, I sense a real anger by some for being at a place voluntarily, that they knew was Conservative from the beginning.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 01:33, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::*A small amount of tact and civility go much further than doing that (calling them as you see them) 100% of the time, no? I just cannot get over the bitterness of some, I sense a real anger by some for being at a place voluntarily, that they knew was Conservative from the beginning.  --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 01:33, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
::: Andrew, my point was that, '''unlike some of the examples actually in the article right now''', the persons who were said to have committed the deceit in my example were adjudged to have done so by a court of law.  They at least had the advantage of (what I had always assumed was) a fair hearing by a properly constituted court.  What is the relevance of what they received for their lies?  I imagine that they thought they would get their reward in heaven.  They probably still do.
 +
 +
::: Terrence, I contain no bitterness.  I just do not like to see conservatism or this site being sullied by unencyclopedic articles.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 01:40, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
634

edits

Navigation menu