Changes

''See also:'' [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments|Common arguments against atheism]]

''See also:'' [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments|Common arguments against atheism]]

[[File:Autumn.jpg|200px|left|thumbnail|The [[argument from beauty]] is a [[teleological argument]].]]

[[File:Autumn.jpg|200px|left|thumbnail|The [[argument from beauty]] is a [[teleological argument]].]]

Also known as '''proofs''' for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance.  Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world, and that any attempt to do so runs the risk of becoming a [[God of the Gaps]] argument.  However, [[Oxford]] scholar Roger Penrose states that [[materialism]] is now the faith of the gaps (see: Atheism of the gaps).<ref>http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9511/revessay.html</ref>  

Also known as [[proof]]s for God's existence, these arguments have not always come with full acceptance.  Those opposed to natural theology claim that God's existence cannot be proven by human reason or the natural world, and that any attempt to do so runs the risk of becoming a [[God of the Gaps]] argument.  However, [[Oxford]] scholar Roger Penrose states that [[materialism]] is now the faith of the gaps (see: Atheism of the gaps).<ref>http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9511/revessay.html</ref>  

Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone.  [[Karl Barth]] is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in [[Jesus Christ]], and Jesus is only revealed in the [[Bible]].  Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence of God can be known through human reason although it is not salvific (not a saving knowledge of God).  [[Thomas Aquinas]] is characteristic of this view, holding to the understanding that the created world reflects aspects of its creator that are apparent to all.  Nonetheless, arguments for the existence of God have been formed throughout church history and continue to be used today, namely in the area of [[Christian apologetics]].  

Viewpoints vary, but responses tend to conclude that God can only be known by supernatural revelation or Scripture alone.  [[Karl Barth]] is a classic example of this as he believed that God is exclusively revealed in [[Jesus Christ]], and Jesus is only revealed in the [[Bible]].  Proponents of natural theology vary as well, but most conclude that the existence of God can be known through human reason although it is not salvific (not a saving knowledge of God).  [[Thomas Aquinas]] is characteristic of this view, holding to the understanding that the created world reflects aspects of its creator that are apparent to all.  Nonetheless, arguments for the existence of God have been formed throughout church history and continue to be used today, namely in the area of [[Christian apologetics]].