Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,855:
Line 1,855: + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:1990'sguy (view source)
Revision as of 01:43, November 28, 2019
, 01:43, November 28, 2019→I hope you agree with this edit I made to one of your articles
I hope you agree with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump_achievements:_Foreign_policy_(2019)&curid=151805&diff=1599943&oldid=1599936 THIS EDIT] I made to one of your articles.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:43, 27 November 2019 (EST)
I hope you agree with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump_achievements:_Foreign_policy_(2019)&curid=151805&diff=1599943&oldid=1599936 THIS EDIT] I made to one of your articles.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:43, 27 November 2019 (EST)
:I disagree. No matter what, this is a significant action, so no matter what we do, it should either be listed as an achievement or failure. I've seen both supportive and critical articles on this from strongly conservative sources (Breitbart, The New American, etc.). Both sides (conservatives, specifically) have made convincing arguments. Thus, I prefer to give the "pro" side the benefit of the doubt to avoid inflating the "failure" section of the sub-article.
:Also, I don't think the fact that the other countries won't like the policy should matter to us. Trump's foreign policy doctrine is America First, so by definition, other countries won't like some U.S. policies (NATO, Paris agreement, immigration, foreign aid, etc.). Thus, that fact alone isn't very important. Also, some sources I read noted the policy is rather modest in scope.
:A good argument against the policy is that the U.S. is engaging in liberal-leaning neocon "human rights" promotion. That's a very valid argument, and some of the sources I cited noted this argument. Also, I believe homosexuality is a sinful practice that is contrary to Scripture (Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9, 1 Timothy 1:10).
:With good arguments for and against -- and with the policy being significant either way -- I'd prefer to keep it in the "achievements" section rather than put it in the "failure" section. I think it has to be in one or the other.
:I hope this clarifies my position on this. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 20:42, 27 November 2019 (EST)