Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,730
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,893:
Line 1,893: + + +
User talk:1990'sguy (view source)
Revision as of 05:09, November 28, 2019
, 05:09, November 28, 2019→I hope you agree with this edit I made to one of your articles
:::I moved the information into a failure section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:52, 27 November 2019 (EST)
:::I moved the information into a failure section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 23:52, 27 November 2019 (EST)
:::Also, if you have other good sources I can cite in those entries, please let me know. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:03, 28 November 2019 (EST)
:::Also, if you have other good sources I can cite in those entries, please let me know. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:03, 28 November 2019 (EST)
Thanks! By the way, ranking #3 for Donald Trump achievement is certainly an accomplishment. The White House website ranks #1 and #2 for that search results. And as Hillary found out, it is tough to compete with Trump!
Here is a suggestion. Why don't you take the failures out of the Donald Trump achievement articles. The failures are non-relevant to those articles. And given the current political polarization, I doubt someone going to a Donald Trump achievement article wants failures listed in the article. I think at most you should put in the fact that some victories were partial victories. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:09, 28 November 2019 (EST)