415
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 149:
Line 149: + + +
Talk:Debate:Listing the Earth's most pressing needs in urgent order of fixing (view source)
Revision as of 14:14, May 14, 2007
, 14:14, May 14, 2007→Discussion regarding religion, evil, etc.
:: Yes, I'll admit that some of the creationist explanations are not as intuitive as one might like. However, I would argue that exactly the same criticism applies to evolution, the Big Bang, etc. Are you aware that the Big Bang model has a similar problem to the starlight/time problem? It's known as the horizon problem, and it's discussed in that book. The cosmologists' solutions are just as convoluted, including proposing that the speed of light used to be different! Now where have I heard that before?
:: Yes, I'll admit that some of the creationist explanations are not as intuitive as one might like. However, I would argue that exactly the same criticism applies to evolution, the Big Bang, etc. Are you aware that the Big Bang model has a similar problem to the starlight/time problem? It's known as the horizon problem, and it's discussed in that book. The cosmologists' solutions are just as convoluted, including proposing that the speed of light used to be different! Now where have I heard that before?
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
:: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I'm again intervening between you two. Sorry... ;-)
Philip, care to elaborate: "because there is good evidence that it is what it claims to be—God's infallible record."? By the way, TimS a few moments ago posted an interesting article on evolution being supposedly unfalsifiable, which might be of interest to both of you [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 10:14, 14 May 2007 (EDT): [[User:Tims/A_Response_to_Locke%27s%2C_%22The_Scientific_Case_Against_Evolution%22]]