Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,466
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: − + Line 100:
Line 100: − + −
→Table of examples: Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: ’s → 's
|... but when Rebecca also had '''''conceived''''' by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the '''''children being not yet born''''', neither having done any good or evil ...).
|... but when Rebecca also had '''''conceived''''' by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the '''''children being not yet born''''', neither having done any good or evil ...).
|... when she had '''''conceived''''' twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad ...
|... when she had '''''conceived''''' twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad ...
|... but Rebekah’s children were '''''conceived''''' at the same time by our father Isaac. Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ....
|... but Rebekah's children were '''''conceived''''' at the same time by our father Isaac. Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ....
|... something similar happened to Rebecca when she had '''''conceived''''' children by one husband, our ancestor Isaac. Even before they had been born or had done anything good or bad ....
|... something similar happened to Rebecca when she had '''''conceived''''' children by one husband, our ancestor Isaac. Even before they had been born or had done anything good or bad ....
|-
|-
|}
|}
Revisions to the NIV further promote feminist distortions.<ref>[http://www.bible-researcher.com/cbmw.niv2011.2.pdf An Evaluation of Gender Language in the
Revisions to the NIV further promote feminist distortions.<ref>[http://www.bible-researcher.com/cbmw.niv2011.2.pdf An Evaluation of Gender Language in the 2011 Edition of the NIV Bible], A report from the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood</ref> The translating committee for the new version of the [[NIV]] lacks any self-described "complementarians" who support the differences between men and women, for example.<ref>"Moo declined to label any of the committee members as "complementarians' ...."[http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4357&Itemid=53 New NIV translation due out in 2011]</ref>
2011 Edition of the NIV Bible], A report from the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood</ref> The translating committee for the new version of the [[NIV]] lacks any self-described "complementarians" who support the differences between men and women, for example.<ref>"Moo declined to label any of the committee members as "complementarians' ...."[http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4357&Itemid=53 New NIV translation due out in 2011]</ref>
Feminists also object to 1 Tim 2:12 ("I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."), but the original Greek is so clear that not much can be done to distort it. Only the most most liberal translations, as in injecting plural forms of "woman" and "man", and also twisting the second half to read "listen quietly."
Feminists also object to 1 Tim 2:12 ("I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent."), but the original Greek is so clear that not much can be done to distort it. Only the most most liberal translations, as in injecting plural forms of "woman" and "man", and also twisting the second half to read "listen quietly."