287
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + + +
Religions and Freud
:::: I removed the claims that some of Freud's new ideas have been shown to be correct. If it were really true, then some book or paper could be cited where the ideas were shown to be correct. The available references say the opposite. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:47, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:::: I removed the claims that some of Freud's new ideas have been shown to be correct. If it were really true, then some book or paper could be cited where the ideas were shown to be correct. The available references say the opposite. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 20:47, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::I’m not sure why this was addressed to me (or if it was, but it seems to have been), but I think that’s great—I’m all for removing unsourced claims and I think a healthy dose of that would do many articles here a great deal of good. Actually I’m fairly happy with how the article looks now. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 23:48, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::I’m not sure why this was addressed to me (or if it was, but it seems to have been), but I think that’s great—I’m all for removing unsourced claims and I think a healthy dose of that would do many articles here a great deal of good. Actually I’m fairly happy with how the article looks now. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 23:48, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
== Religions and Freud ==
Freud has imaginative theories about religions and there they are comming from (Totem and Taboo: Resemblances Between the Mental Lives of Savages and Neurotics). Should these be critisized here? --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 10:38, 14 May 2007 (EDT)