182
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: + − So, whether or not you agree with it, closing your eyes won't make same-sex marriage go away. It's important to note the movement's progress, which is all the article currently does. And while you may consider the phrase oxymoronic, discussion on the talk page, common parlance, and accepted definitions all seem to prove to the contrary. Please don't take a losing talk-page battle to AFD out of spite.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 12:03, 14 May 2007 (EDT)+
Conservapedia:Articles for deletion (view source)
Revision as of 16:04, May 14, 2007
, 16:04, May 14, 2007→[["Same-sex marriage"]]
This is nonsense. It is little more than Conservapedia being used to further the gay agenda. Even the entry at [[Marriage]], which likewise appears written to further the gay agenda, states,
This is nonsense. It is little more than Conservapedia being used to further the gay agenda. Even the entry at [[Marriage]], which likewise appears written to further the gay agenda, states,
''"In the U.S. there are over a thousand federal benefits to marriage but none to same-sex civil partnerships"'', thus proving such an entity does not exist. IOW, there is no such thing as "gay marraige", "same sex marriage", etc. It is a contradiction in terms, and simply is using Conservapedia as a platform to gain recognition or acceptance of the contradiction as a norm. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
''"In the U.S. there are over a thousand federal benefits to marriage but none to same-sex civil partnerships"'', thus proving such an entity does not exist. IOW, there is no such thing as "gay marraige", "same sex marriage", etc. It is a contradiction in terms, and simply is using Conservapedia as a platform to gain recognition or acceptance of the contradiction as a norm. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
:So, whether or not you agree with it, closing your eyes won't make same-sex marriage go away. It's important to note the movement's progress, which is all the article currently does. And while you may consider the phrase oxymoronic, discussion on the talk page, common parlance, and accepted definitions all seem to prove to the contrary. Please don't take a losing talk-page battle to AFD out of spite.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 12:03, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
=== Decision ===
=== Decision ===
=== Background ===
=== Background ===
=== Keep ===
=== Keep ===
* '''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 12:04, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
=== Delete ===
=== Delete ===
* [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
* [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
=== Comments ===
=== Comments ===