368
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→editing
Somebody found some talking fossils apparently.
Somebody found some talking fossils apparently.
==Remind me not to spend hours on an article ever again! <i>P.S. please don't <s>stone</s> ban me for expressing my opinion (see [[First amendment]])</i>==
Just 2 days after I wrote this article, using only reliable sources, it's already been vandalized beyond recognition, look! It even has quotes of questionable origin already!
Do we really have to have this "but creationist assert this and quote <s>mine</s> that, and the flood ..." thingy in every article, there's plenty of that on other pages.
I did not claim this article for myself, I just set some guidelines for other editors to keep it factual and respectable (most people out there aren't YECs you know!)
Why the f*ck are there no dates in the intro anymore? Do they threaten the emotional comfort of your little <s>medieval</s> sheltered world? You think you're making Jesus proud through ignorance?
And yes, of course that picture of neanderthal men came from a website: I can't exactly go take a picture of a living neanderthal myself, now can I?
And it's "Homo neanderthlalensis", not "Homo sapiens neanderthalensis" as in <b>separate</b> species, Tims is a molecular biologist, what are you?
What's wrong with writing an article according to the current scientific consensus? Sure I could make something up too, maybe even twist the facts just enough to make everything fit in with Egyptian mythology! But I chose to follow the <b>experts</b> instead.
If the reader is a YEC he's not gonna believe this article anyway!
AiG more credible than the Smithsonian?
Yeah, of course <s>a bunch of uneducated hillbillies</s> AiG's YECs are more credible than the Smithsonian's accredited biologists and archaeologists when it comes to science!
[[User:MiddleMan|MiddleMan]]