In the aftermath of the incident the Reagan administration stated that the crew of Vincennes had acted appropriately to the situation. The US government was soon to back down and claim that the incident was an error that occured because the USS Vincennes mistook the passenger plane's flight for that of a F-14A Tomcat in an attack run, but the combat system of the ship recorded that the plane was ascending, in contrary to an attack run, where the jet should be descending. However, in 2000, the US government stated a more plausible hypothesis that the attack was a result of scenario fulfillment, where soldiers under pressure will carry out a training scenario whilst ignoring elements and informations that contradict it, leading the Navy men to ignore evidence of the plane being a passenger plane such as its flight path, and its relatively slow speed when placed in comparison to that of a F-14A Tomcat. | In the aftermath of the incident the Reagan administration stated that the crew of Vincennes had acted appropriately to the situation. The US government was soon to back down and claim that the incident was an error that occured because the USS Vincennes mistook the passenger plane's flight for that of a F-14A Tomcat in an attack run, but the combat system of the ship recorded that the plane was ascending, in contrary to an attack run, where the jet should be descending. However, in 2000, the US government stated a more plausible hypothesis that the attack was a result of scenario fulfillment, where soldiers under pressure will carry out a training scenario whilst ignoring elements and informations that contradict it, leading the Navy men to ignore evidence of the plane being a passenger plane such as its flight path, and its relatively slow speed when placed in comparison to that of a F-14A Tomcat. |