Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,657
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 65:
Line 65: + + + +
reason for rollback
If we accept the Young Earth Creationist viewpoint, shouldn't an ice age that lasted 700 years after the great flood (more than 10% of recorded human existence) command more than a single quote from Job? [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]] 16:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
If we accept the Young Earth Creationist viewpoint, shouldn't an ice age that lasted 700 years after the great flood (more than 10% of recorded human existence) command more than a single quote from Job? [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]] 16:53, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
== Reason for rollback ==
I rolled back the edit of the correct statement that supporters of evolution and an old earth were the first to propose a (massive) Ice Age. That is factually true and should not be deleted. I'll find a reference.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:27, 14 May 2007 (EDT)