Changes

*the proposed amendment never mentions "women" but only "sex," which liberals vaguely define to including transgenderism and "gender identity."<ref>Waggoner, Kristen (December 30, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/475849-reviving-the-era-using-womens-rights-to-undermine-womens-rights Reviving the ERA: Using women's rights to undermine women's rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.</ref>

*the proposed amendment never mentions "women" but only "sex," which liberals vaguely define to including transgenderism and "gender identity."<ref>Waggoner, Kristen (December 30, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/475849-reviving-the-era-using-womens-rights-to-undermine-womens-rights Reviving the ERA: Using women's rights to undermine women's rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.</ref>

The deadline for ratifying ERA expired on June 30, 1982, but like an episode from the ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  Accordingly, it is referred to as "fake legislation" now.  

The original deadline for ratifying ERA expired on March 22, 1979, and then an improper extension expired on June 30, 1982. But like an episode from the ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  On January 8, 2020, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the [[Department of Justice]] issued a detailed legal analysis concluding that ERA was completely dead and cannot be revived, and that only a new ratification process could be started.<ref>https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1232501/download</ref>  The Archivist of the United States then issued a statement that he would abide by that conclusion and not recognize any additional ratifications.<ref>https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases-4</ref>

==Text==

==Text==