Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,381
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + +
no edit summary
==Date==
==Date==
Luke is generally believed to have been written in the 70's or 80's, but it is also possible it was written in the late 50's or early 60's based upon the abrupt ending in Acts. The thinking goes why wouldn't Luke have continued the history in Acts if he had written it later? And why wouldn't he have mentioned the [[martyr|martyrdom]] of Paul?
Luke is generally believed to have been written in the 70's or 80's, but it is also possible it was written in the late 50's or early 60's based upon the abrupt ending in Acts. The thinking goes why wouldn't Luke have continued the history in Acts if he had written it later? And why wouldn't he have mentioned the [[martyr|martyrdom]] of Paul?
== See also ==
*[[Luke and 'the' Census]]
[[Category:Bible]]
[[Category:Bible]]
[[Category:New Testament]]
[[Category:New Testament]]
[[Category:Gospel of Luke]]
[[Category:Gospel of Luke]]