Changes

:...but, again, it tacitly acknowledges that what the authors of Scripture write may not be the ''whole'' truth...which is a very risky road to pursue when arguing for Biblical inerrancy.  If the authors can leave things out in one place, they can leave things out in other places; who's to say what those things might be, and whether or not they might be important?

:...but, again, it tacitly acknowledges that what the authors of Scripture write may not be the ''whole'' truth...which is a very risky road to pursue when arguing for Biblical inerrancy.  If the authors can leave things out in one place, they can leave things out in other places; who's to say what those things might be, and whether or not they might be important?

:I remain unable to embrace the grammatical-historical doctrine of Biblical inerrancy.  Though I accept and believe in the Truth of the Bible, I do not believe that God would restrict true knowledge of His Word to a select few elite scholars capable of semantically parsing the autographic texts.

:I remain unable to embrace the [[Historical-grammatical method (Literal hermeneutic)|grammatical-historical]] doctrine of Biblical inerrancy.  Though I accept and believe in the Truth of the Bible, I do not believe that God would restrict true knowledge of His Word to a select few elite scholars capable of semantically parsing the autographic texts.

   [[User:BenP|BenP]] 21:23, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

   [[User:BenP|BenP]] 21:23, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

Hold on, now. Don’t assume anything. You don’t know what I believe on the subject because I haven’t stated anything yet. I simply asked about what you believe.  I actually do hold to the doctrine of the Trinity, as it is the Biblical truth. I was simply trying to follow up on what you said about different Christ and God being different entities. If they are, then Christ couldn’t be the one God. Because by definition two entities are two entirely separate beings, so God and Christ wouldn’t be the same. That’s why the Trinity is referred to as one God, three persons, not three separate beings. But it sounds like you hold to the doctrine as well, so we agree on that. Perhaps it’s just a communication error. I wanted to make sure you weren’t rejecting the divinity of Christ. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 13:30, 10 May 2008 (EDT)

Hold on, now. Don’t assume anything. You don’t know what I believe on the subject because I haven’t stated anything yet. I simply asked about what you believe.  I actually do hold to the doctrine of the Trinity, as it is the Biblical truth. I was simply trying to follow up on what you said about different Christ and God being different entities. If they are, then Christ couldn’t be the one God. Because by definition two entities are two entirely separate beings, so God and Christ wouldn’t be the same. That’s why the Trinity is referred to as one God, three persons, not three separate beings. But it sounds like you hold to the doctrine as well, so we agree on that. Perhaps it’s just a communication error. I wanted to make sure you weren’t rejecting the divinity of Christ. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 13:30, 10 May 2008 (EDT)

==References==

==References==