Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 71:
Line 71: + + Line 97:
Line 99: + +
Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism? (view source)
Revision as of 03:43, May 15, 2007
, 03:43, May 15, 2007no edit summary
:::'''Missile Defense Shield'''? Unless the missiles in questions are RPGs, when do we need a "missile defense shield" for? The Soviet Union is DEAD, folks. Get over it and start strategizing for the enemy we have NOW. And against Terror, a Panel Truck Defense Shield would be a much better investment.
:::'''Missile Defense Shield'''? Unless the missiles in questions are RPGs, when do we need a "missile defense shield" for? The Soviet Union is DEAD, folks. Get over it and start strategizing for the enemy we have NOW. And against Terror, a Panel Truck Defense Shield would be a much better investment.
:::And here's a little much-needed [http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2007/05/perspective.html perspective]. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 13:25, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
:::And here's a little much-needed [http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2007/05/perspective.html perspective]. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 13:25, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Gulik, you are part of the problem. When you say let's recognize the enemy we have now. That's a nice saying yet Democrats don't want to think about the enemy. They want to believe the enemy is the USA. The missle defense shield is not designed to strike 2,000 missle launches from Russia. It is designed against the threat of rogue nations. We have military trucks that can absord the impact of IEDs and RPGs. The Democrats decided Spinach farmers, the minimum wage and peanut storage was money better spent.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 23:43, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Democrats are the most capable in fighting Bush only, Republicans are so much more concerned about the fight against terror. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:29, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Democrats are the most capable in fighting Bush only, Republicans are so much more concerned about the fight against terror. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 12:29, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Then they ought to prove it. As it is, as many people die from terrorist attacks EVERY DAY in Iraq as died at Virginia Tech. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 13:21, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
Then they ought to prove it. As it is, as many people die from terrorist attacks EVERY DAY in Iraq as died at Virginia Tech. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 13:21, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
To prove it means somebody has to win and somebody has to lose. The democrats need a loss badly, will not accept any talk of victory. When many people die of terror attacks everyday, you obviously blame? --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 23:43, 14 May 2007 (EDT)