Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 120:
Line 120: + +
Essay:Rebuttal to Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 06:07, January 29, 2020
, 06:07, January 29, 2020Reply to section 14
#:
#:
#:::::There is actually a very simple explanation for the scientific community's silence on this matter, a deduction of which Mr. Holmes would approve: The reason that no one is publishing data or analyses that claim to refute relativity is that such claim would be false, and that the existing analyses, using exquisitely accurate spacecraft data, are correct.
#:::::There is actually a very simple explanation for the scientific community's silence on this matter, a deduction of which Mr. Holmes would approve: The reason that no one is publishing data or analyses that claim to refute relativity is that such claim would be false, and that the existing analyses, using exquisitely accurate spacecraft data, are correct.
#::::'''REPLY''': The supposed precession of Mercury is based on non-repeatable observations as well as observations made by individuals with vested interests that the theories of relativity remain true. The error bars of various predictions could have been shifted by backfiguring to what would move them the closest in the future to the error range supposed to accompany the theoretical values. The foolishness around Global Warming theories show us that such a step is not only possible, but probable due to the observed vanity of scientists as well as to the falsification of the 1919 measurements made in hopes of rectifying the absence of a concrete example of the theories nearly two decades after their first proposal by [[Henri Poincaré]].
#:
#:
#::::Regarding which, even the authorship of the theories of relativity is an example of the misrepresentations used to promote it to fuel the self-aggrandizement of physicists and their profit motive, to be attained by increasing the esteem of the physics profession on the questionable basis of making academic noise to attract research dollars by using the theories as their tympana.
#''Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found. Sound like global warming?''
#''Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravity waves predicted by the theory, none has ever been found. Sound like global warming?''
#:True, the ''direct'' searches for gravitational waves had not yet yielded any clear results at the time that item was written (September 2012), though indirect observations had been made (the Hulse/Taylor observations.) Before people dismiss indirect observations, recall that no one has ever seen an electron.
#:True, the ''direct'' searches for gravitational waves had not yet yielded any clear results at the time that item was written (September 2012), though indirect observations had been made (the Hulse/Taylor observations.) Before people dismiss indirect observations, recall that no one has ever seen an electron.