nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 72:
Line 72: + +
→Reason for rollback: It was Agassiz.
:I see you posted a reference to Charles Lyell as support of the evolutionist support for an Ice Age. Yet [[Louis Agassiz]] was the main proponent and he was firmly anti-evolution. Lyell was a reluctant convert to evolution as he was a steady-statist and he was also a late convert to glaciation as it went against his steady state hypothesis. So to use Lyell as the sole justification for stating that ice-ages are related to evolution when there are creationists who believe in an ice age after the flood seems disingenuous. [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]] 19:30, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
:I see you posted a reference to Charles Lyell as support of the evolutionist support for an Ice Age. Yet [[Louis Agassiz]] was the main proponent and he was firmly anti-evolution. Lyell was a reluctant convert to evolution as he was a steady-statist and he was also a late convert to glaciation as it went against his steady state hypothesis. So to use Lyell as the sole justification for stating that ice-ages are related to evolution when there are creationists who believe in an ice age after the flood seems disingenuous. [[User:Ian St John|Ian St John]] 19:30, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
::Ian St John is correct. The Ice Age was first promoted by Louis Agassiz, anti-evolutionist. I've changed the articles accordingly, including putting in a couple of references. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:57, 15 May 2007 (EDT)