Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 40: Line 40:  
== "Illegitimate historical-critical findings". ==
 
== "Illegitimate historical-critical findings". ==
   −
Some liberal scholars and agnostic and atheistic researchers ''abuse'' legitimate historical-critical methodologies, by artificially divorcing this approach from reliable historical-grammatical methodologies, solely to advance their own philosophical, even political,  [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hidden-agenda agenda] against the historical reliability of the Bible, by obscuring, and thereby attempting to invalidate, the true ''sensus literalis historicus,'' or "the literal historical meaning" of the text.
+
Some liberal scholars and agnostic and atheistic researchers ''abuse'' legitimate historical-critical methodologies, by artificially divorcing this approach from reliable [[Historical-grammatical method (Literal hermeneutic)|historical-grammatical methodologies]], solely to advance their own philosophical, even political,  [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hidden-agenda agenda] against the historical reliability of the Bible, by obscuring, and thereby attempting to invalidate, the true ''sensus literalis historicus,'' or "the literal historical meaning" of the text.
    
=== Radical critical scholars: abuse of critical methods ===
 
=== Radical critical scholars: abuse of critical methods ===
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu