| − | Some liberal scholars and agnostic and atheistic researchers ''abuse'' legitimate historical-critical methodologies, by artificially divorcing this approach from reliable historical-grammatical methodologies, solely to advance their own philosophical, even political, [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hidden-agenda agenda] against the historical reliability of the Bible, by obscuring, and thereby attempting to invalidate, the true ''sensus literalis historicus,'' or "the literal historical meaning" of the text. | + | Some liberal scholars and agnostic and atheistic researchers ''abuse'' legitimate historical-critical methodologies, by artificially divorcing this approach from reliable [[Historical-grammatical method (Literal hermeneutic)|historical-grammatical methodologies]], solely to advance their own philosophical, even political, [http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hidden-agenda agenda] against the historical reliability of the Bible, by obscuring, and thereby attempting to invalidate, the true ''sensus literalis historicus,'' or "the literal historical meaning" of the text. |