Changes

*The proposed amendment never mentions "women" but only "sex," which liberals vaguely define to include "[[gender confusion|transgenderism]]" and "gender identity."<ref>Waggoner, Kristen (December 30, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/475849-reviving-the-era-using-womens-rights-to-undermine-womens-rights Reviving the ERA: Using women's rights to undermine women's rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.</ref>

*The proposed amendment never mentions "women" but only "sex," which liberals vaguely define to include "[[gender confusion|transgenderism]]" and "gender identity."<ref>Waggoner, Kristen (December 30, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/475849-reviving-the-era-using-womens-rights-to-undermine-womens-rights Reviving the ERA: Using women's rights to undermine women's rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.</ref>

The original deadline for ratifying ERA expired on March 22, 1979, and then an improper extension expired on June 30, 1982. But like an episode from the ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  On January 8, 2020, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the [[Department of Justice]] issued a detailed legal analysis concluding that ERA was completely dead and cannot be revived, and that only a new ratification process could be started.<ref>https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1232501/download</ref>  The Archivist of the United States then issued a statement that he would abide by that conclusion and not recognize any additional ratifications.<ref>https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases-4</ref>

The original deadline for ratifying ERA expired on March 22, 1979, and then an improper extension expired on June 30, 1982. But like an episode from ''[[The Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  On January 8, 2020, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the [[Department of Justice]] issued a detailed legal analysis concluding that ERA was completely dead and cannot be revived, and that only a new ratification process could be started.<ref>https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1232501/download</ref>  The Archivist of the United States then issued a statement that he would abide by that conclusion and not recognize any additional ratifications.<ref>https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases-4</ref>

==Text==

==Text==