| Line 1,431: |
Line 1,431: |
| | | | |
| | :Liberals need to look in the mirror and instead of wrongly seeing themselves as climate heroes for their colleges' science departments, they should truly see themselves as following imaginary crusades pursued for the sake of their leaders' own self-advancement. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 00:39, 28 December 2019 (EST) | | :Liberals need to look in the mirror and instead of wrongly seeing themselves as climate heroes for their colleges' science departments, they should truly see themselves as following imaginary crusades pursued for the sake of their leaders' own self-advancement. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 00:39, 28 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == AOC for president? == |
| | + | |
| | + | AOC will be 31 on inauguration day 2021. A president has to be at least 35, according to the Constitution. Perhaps ''Politico'' is talking about 2024. IMO, the article is intentionally misleading and tries to generate hype for something that is impossible. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 13:35, 27 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :The year 2020 is the year of the 700th Olympiad. In 20 A.D. it was the 200th Olympiad. I've been given to understand that that event back then was a harbinger of the appearance of the Messiah. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 00:07, 28 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | ::Isaac Newton was a smart guy and a faithful Christian. He had some opinions on these matters: "[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzn0QhzvTq8 Why did Sir Isaac Newton predict the world would end in 2060 AD?]" [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:48, 28 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | :::Apparently he wrote a ''lot'' about the Bible. |
| | + | |
| | + | :::Here's my contribution: 2020 will be the first all-even year number since 2008, but more amazing is the year 2022 in the trinary number system is 2202220. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 08:11, 29 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | The Conservapedia biography of AOC correctly gives her birthyear, and it correctly gives her static age at the time of her election to Congress. But no template is used to dynamically display her age. We should add a sentence, "Because she is only <nowiki>{{age|1989|10|13}}</nowiki>, she is ineligible to run for President of the United States." In the meantime, the main page right item is confusing to our readers. [[User:GChang|GChang]] ([[User talk:GChang|talk]]) 02:09, 28 December 2019 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :AOC may challenge Schumer in a primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 02:49, 3 February 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Coronavirus Article == |
| | + | Why is there not an article about coronaviruses and the outbreak that has spread to the United States? I'm only seeing a self-serving blurb on the main page. Why can't the Best of the Public provide a knowledgeable article to inform our readers? --[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 18:04, 26 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :Great point. Thank you!!!! I'll start one now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:47, 26 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | [[File:Prophet Moses.jpg|right|150px]] |
| | + | ::'''[[Asian atheism|East Asian atheists]] have''' live cats and exotic animals in cages in their food markets, which medical authorities believe likely caused the Wuhan [[coronavirus]][https://www.businessinsider.com/wuhan-virus-china-bans-food-markets-selling-live-animals-wolves-2020-1]. Modern, medical authorities in [[China]] are now using the [[Mosaic Law|Mosaic principle]] of [[quarantine]] to help contain the epidemic.[https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/01/china-quarantine-coronavirus/605455/] See: [[The Bible and health]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ::If the Chinese, atheist leaders instituted better quality control in terms of a food delivery system instead of having a barbaric and cruel cat slaughtering industry, perhaps this epidemic may have never happened. See: [[Cat slaughtering practices in China]] and [[Dietary practices of atheists]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ::China, which has the largest [[atheist population]] in the world, is now paying a tribute to [[Moses]] by having the largest quarantine in human history! See: [[China and atheism]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ::As much as I hate to say it, once again Bible believers most certainly feel compelled to declare victory over atheists! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D74-4dN5Iag Olé! Olé! Olé!][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:04, 26 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :Our top six MPR articles are all on [[coronavirus]]; this information needs to be put into the actual article, not just randomly strewn across MPR. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 23:48, 27 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | ::I have a suspicion that some of the articles about the [[dietary practices of atheists]] on the internet are caused by someone with a unique sense of humor who has a low esteem for atheism/atheist. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HrfbV16-FQ Cats and dogs and babies], oh my![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:19, 28 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :::Over 20,000 page views for the [[Atheists eat babies meme]] article. The newly minted article [[Atheism and rodent eating]] article has about 300 page views thus far.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:32, 28 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | ::::Mercian appears to be getting angrier and angrier. Instead of getting angry, he should try to debunk the information in my popular [[Atheists eat babies meme]] article. In addition, he cannot defend the notion that bringing Muslims into a culture with a significant amount of libertines, is not going to be a causal factor for violence. Sad![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:26, 28 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | === To: Mercian, flashback: Anglophobia=== |
| | + | |
| | + | :I read an article about the Irish potato famine, and it formed a horrific picture in my mind of Irish politicians so committed to protecting Ireland's vanity that they refused charitable food assistance from Queen Victoria and insisted that the transaction must take the form of Great Britain beginning enormous public works projects and paying workers from Ireland to do the work. |
| | + | |
| | + | :But now Mercian insists that we deny that picture that history presents to our senses and just accept that Great Britain "allowed millions of Irish to starve on more than one occasion". |
| | + | |
| | + | :Mercian's description allows for an enormous range of possible culpability from the trivial to the [[Holodomor]], where millions of Ukranians starved to death, so why would he choose a description of an event so vague that it can't be relevant to anything, while yet presented as if it were intended to ''prove'' something? |
| | + | |
| | + | :I don't think Mercian is a poor arguer; I think Mercian is too controlling; he presents that which we have thought about particular historical events using his propositional speech in such a way as to normalize basic mistrust of Great Britain, the subtext being that the indignity of being the object of such a range of possible outcomes in meaning regarding its blame is appropriate enough to its subject. |
| | + | |
| | + | :When Mercian presents these hints about an odiosity in Great Britain's behavior, like the boy who cried wolf, you either investigate in order to contradict him well, and he could say "see, you agreed it ''was'' appropriate enough", or you confront the attempted intervention between the passage of Great Britain's reputation to its national observers, and he could say "You didn't have the compassion to even look to see if the worst were true. You can't believe your eyes and ears when you look at the picture formed in your mind (or even evaluate your common experience in passing) upon reading the recitation of ordinary historical facts indicative of Great Britain's virtue." There's no downside for him! |
| | + | |
| | + | :I propose to dub this weak defense of one's propositions through this kind of ambivalent playing of the informant together with the potential of asking us to deny our sensations (applying in this case to sensations of those images presented by our historical narrators) the "Mercian"—as it was I who discovered it. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 05:43, 29 March 2018 (EDT) |
| | + | ::Mercian, is one of at least 3 British atheists who have been obsessed with my internet writings. One thing that atheists are known for is their poor grasp of history and/or their historical revisionism. See: [[Atheism and historical revisionism]]. Of course, this is not surprising as it is very apparent that that Jesus Christ had on an extremely positive effect on the world and the best explanation of this was that He was God in the flesh and that He rose from the dead.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:46, 1 April 2018 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | Come to think of it, didn't Chewy pull a Mercian a few days ago? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Tuesday, 16:50, 28 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :::The denizens of a certain wiki criticized my articles on the brutal cat/dog trade in atheist controlled China. And now Mercian digs himself in deeper by continuing the criticism of my commentary on this cat/dog trade. Why can't they just admit that atheists do a poor job of running things? Why can't they just admit that atheists eating live rodents is disgraceful? See: [[Atheism and rodent eating]].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:07, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ==== Mercian: The blood of the Manchester Arena Bombing victims are on the hands of British liberals/leftists/moderates ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::'''Mercian wrote:''' "I admit that eating live rodents is disgusting but nowhere near as disgusting as murdering young people because they disagree with you politically. Personally I would rather eat rodents for the rest of my life than kill one single person but Mr Conservative glorifies in killing kids and even post Oles when it does happen. When will he admit that killing children is disgusting? Never because he agrees and applauds the concept." |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::'''My response, 3 things''': '''1)''' I am glad you admitted that Eastern atheists (who make up the majority of the world's atheists and perhaps agnostics as well as per the information cited in the article [[Asian atheism]]) eating live rodents is disgusting. '''2)''' You didn't admit that that the cat/dog slaughtering methods in China are barbaric and that the trade did not follow good health practices and thus may have been a causal factor to the coronavirus epidemic '''3)''' Secular leftists/liberals/moderates opened the floodgates of Muslim immigration to Britain/UK. Despite any ideological blindness that may have impaired their judgment ([[multiculturism]], the belief that all cultures are equal, the anti-empirical belief that a large percentage of first/second generation Muslims would be assimilated into the UK/Europe. See: [[Religious immigrants to Europe resistant to secularization]]), given what is known about Muslim culture including its more violence aspects/individuals ala [[Islamic terrorism]], it was willful blindness not to foresee that violence would erupt from Muslims against socially libertine/liberal individuals/organizations. Thus, the Manchester Arena Bombing is squarely on the shoulders of British individuals such as Mercian and certainly not on the shoulders of any Americans who lean on the right side of the political spectrum such as myself (not all editors of the User: Conservative are as right leaning as I am, but all of them do believe in religious liberty).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:54, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :::::By now, all Mercian ever seems to do is recite historical fantasies flattering to his political self-advancement that he tailors out of whole cloth and then tries to use as a backdrop to make anything he says, true or false, look less abnormal by comparison—and does so in a smug manner to try to divert from the fact that his credibility has already been shot a long time ago by his increasing use of this same practice, even before it was explicitly described. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Wednesday, 10:15, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | Mercian bitterly said: "At no point in that little tirade did you deny that you glorify in the murder of children." |
| | + | |
| | + | I take no pleasure in teenage girls being enamored with the work of the liberal/feminist Ariana Grande who famously said, ""I hate Americans. I hate America." in response to seeing a tray of donuts. Last time I checked, many cultures have sweets. And obesity, with the exception of places like Japan, various religious, African countries and other countries, is becoming a worldwide problem as evidenced by the documentary [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFlBLbH69d8&list=PLp3ZMYmJUc3VQ3tFnQ5TJgHwLZGKR7D2Z Globesity]. And much to the dismay of permissive liberals, Japan is hardcore against being fat![https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Et3-GI6z7s4] The ''New York Times'' wrote: "To reach its goals of shrinking the overweight population by 10 percent over the next four years and 25 percent over the next seven years, the government will impose financial penalties on companies and local governments that fail to meet specific targets. The country’s Ministry of Health argues that the campaign will keep the spread of diseases like diabetes and strokes in check."[https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/world/asia/13fat.html] |
| | + | |
| | + | Jesus said that a good tree will produce good fruit and a bad tree produces bad fruit. According to ''Elle'' Magazine, "Ariana Grande joined Madonna on stage for a racy, twerk-filled performance of 'Music.'[https://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/news/a41203/ariana-grande-madonna-racy-performance/] According to ''Vogue'' magazine, "Guest stars included Coldplay, Katy Perry, and Justin Bieber, and Grande cruised the stage belting out her dirtiest songs at the request of one victim’s mother after it was suggested that the bomber, who had links to the Islamic State, had acted in protest of her racy pop persona."[https://www.vogue.com/article/ariana-grande-cover-august-2019] While I am no fan of the Islamic State, Ms. Grande is a hedonist and there is certainly no shortage of single mothers so the lifestyle she is promoting is not a healthy lifestyle - especially when you consider that 70-80% of murders/rapists come from single parent homes without fathers.[https://www.kidsoutdoorzone.com/fatherless-statistics] And post feminism, more women are now unhappy with their lives.[https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969][https://thefederalist.com/2018/12/11/the-feminist-life-script-has-made-many-women-miserable-dont-let-it-sucker-you/] |
| | + | |
| | + | Grande has been seeing a mental health professional for about a decade (started after her parents divorce) so she is certainly not a strong role model who is prospering in her mental/spiritual life. She also supports the homosexual agenda which advocates a lifestyle that is physically/mentally/spiritually destructive (see: [[Homosexuality and health]]). Furthermore, she supports Bernie Sanders and socialism is a very economically destructive force (Venezuela, etc.). |
| | + | |
| | + | And it doesn't take a genius to understand that mixing the hedonist/liberal Ariana Grande in an area with a lot of Muslims like Manchester (Manchester has a 15.8% Muslim population which translates to 79,496 Muslims) is not a great idea. Culturally, they are oil and water and in an era of Islamic terrorism you are needlessly putting misguided teenage women in danger (I provide data related to this matter below). Unfortunately, Ariana Grande and her security team, the parents of her fans, and the British politicians and intelligence/police officials failed to realize this obvious truth which is very blind of them - especially post 2015 Paris Islamic terrorism. |
| | + | |
| | + | Dr. Peter Hammond wrote: |
| | + | |
| | + | "When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris --car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam - Mohammed cartoons). |
| | + | |
| | + | *Guyana -- Muslim 10% |
| | + | *India -- Muslim 13.4% |
| | + | *Israel -- Muslim 16% |
| | + | *Kenya -- Muslim 10% |
| | + | *Russia -- Muslim 10-15% |
| | + | |
| | + | After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning: Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%."[https://virtueonline.org/what-islam-isnt-dr-peter-hammond] |
| | + | |
| | + | In short, the blood of Manchester Arena Bombing is on the hands of pro-Islam immigration advocates which typically are in Mercian's ideological camp and certainly not mine. |
| | + | |
| | + | "Can a man take fire in his bosom, and his clothes not be burned?" - King [[Solomon]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:07, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :Mercian, I know it grates on you when I point out the foolish and often self-absorbed mindset of secularists/liberals/leftists who fail to see the consequences of their actions, but instead of being filled with seething rage, I suggest becoming a Christian conservative. Then you can become a happy warrior who merrily skewers the folly of secularists/liberals/leftists and topples over their most sacred cows. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAYSQXSMnss&feature=related Olé! Olé! Olé!].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:39, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | ::By the way, the secularization rate of Britain is now zero (see: [[British atheism]] and [[Western World areas with stagnant secularization rates]]). Evangelicalism/pentecostalism/Islam are growing in Britain and it is only a matter of time before the air supply of atheism/agnosticism is cut off in Britain - namely [[evolution]]ary indoctrination in public schools. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Already, British Muslims are refusing to send their children to British schools pushing the homosexual agenda. And the new atheist [[Richard Dawkins]] is complaining that British teachers are kowtowing to British, Muslim, creationist schoolchildren and their parents lest they make them upset (see: [[Causes of the New Atheism movement#New Atheism as a reaction to creationism|New Atheism as a reaction to creationism]]). |
| | + | |
| | + | ::The ''Christian Post'' reported on July 21, 2019 as far as Britain: "The percentage of respondents who said they were nondenominational Christians increased from 3% of the population in 1998 to 13% in 2018." See: [[Growth of evangelical Christianity in irreligious regions]] |
| | + | |
| | + | ::On December 23, 2012, Professor Eric Kaufmann who teaches at Birbeck College, University of London wrote: |
| | + | :::"I argue that 97% of the world's population growth is taking place in the developing world, where 95% of people are religious. |
| | + | |
| | + | :::On the other hand, the secular West and East Asia has very low fertility and a rapidly aging population. The demographic disparity between the religious, growing global South and the aging, secular global North will peak around 2050. In the coming decades, the developed world's demand for workers to pay its pensions and work in its service sector will soar alongside the booming supply of young people in the third world. Ergo, we can expect significant immigration to the secular West which will import religious revival on the back of ethnic change. In addition, those with religious beliefs tend to have higher birth rates than the secular population, with fundamentalists having far larger families. The epicentre of these trends will be in immigration gateway cities like New York (a third white), Amsterdam (half Dutch), Los Angeles (28% white), and '''London''', 45% white British.[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/97-of-worlds-population-growth-is.html] |
| | + | |
| | + | ::Bye, bye evolutionary indoctrination. First it will fall in London and then other cities with sizable religious fundamentalist populations. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::"The history of war proves that nine out of ten times an army has been destroyed because its supply lines have been cut off...” - General Douglas MacArthur.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:29, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :::Mercian, the rise of religious fundamentalism and creationism in Britain in the 21st century can be seen [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKpCRILznoc&feature=emb_logo HERE].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:33, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | LMAO! Oh no he didn't! Oh no he didn't! Globesity is good, but I still like Globaloney. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Wednesday, 20:07, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | I would guess that the neocommunists want to normalize violence by means of the mixed population you described, and that they consider their own people being some of the fatalities to be an acceptable loss. But if you're on their side, you're not supposed to actually ''point out'' the contradiction by trying to ''hide'' it by way of blaming the political expert who's examining whether or not to dignify your abuse with an answer! |
| | + | |
| | + | Even the neocommunists don't want Mercian—they don't need babies; they need people who know what they're doing! [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Wednesday, 20:49, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | :[[Globesity]] is a recent [[World Health Organization]] (WHO) term for the global [[obesity]] epidemic.[http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:51, 29 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | ==== Mercian: He is still the bitter and delusional irreligious man living in La La Land ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | He recently said about the Manchester Arena Bombing: "I take no pleasure in teenage girls being enamored with the work of the liberal/feminist Ariana Grande." But you do take pleasure in them dying don't you you murderous (by proxy) scumbag. "Fred Phelps is dead, long live his successor"--Mercian (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | |
| | + | A few points: |
| | + | |
| | + | 1. I did not ask British, Muslim terrorists to bomb the Ariana Grande concert. They are not a proxy of mine. |
| | + | |
| | + | On the contrary, despite having very cordial relationships with Muslims in my area, I am anti-Muslim immigration to the USA/UK/Europe in terms of large numbers of people. It is a recipe for civil strife and Muslim terror attacks. |
| | + | |
| | + | On the other hand, people in Mercian's ideological camp, are pro-Muslim immigration to Western countries. Yet, they don't want to accept the responsibility as far as the consequences of what occurs by doing this. |
| | + | |
| | + | 2. Given her reputation for being risqué and being pro-homosexuality, Ariana Grande and her security team did the equivalent of hitting a hornet's nest with a stick by having her concert in an area with a very significant concentration of Muslims like Manchester, UK (Britain and France have had their share of Muslim terrorism so it wasn't like the concert bombing was like lightning striking with a blue sky). A very high percentage of Muslims are not assimilating into European culture as can be seen in this article: [[Religious immigrants to Europe resistant to secularization]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | It is well known that many Muslims want women to "cover up". It is well known that many British Muslims are anti-homosexuality. |
| | + | |
| | + | Here is a 2019 news report about Ariana Grande from the Belfast Telegraph: [https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/entertainment/music/news/ariana-grande-celebrates-26th-birthday-with-risque-photo-38256911.html Ariana Grande celebrates 26th birthday with risqué photo]. |
| | + | |
| | + | James Harkin wrote in the ''Daily Mail'': |
| | + | |
| | + | :"Now that it seems likely the atrocity in Manchester was carried out by a freelance 'soldier' allied to Islamic State, there's good reason to think neither the venue nor the performer were chosen at random. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Why would anyone target a concert by the American singer Ariana Grande? The grim answer may lie in the fact that with her revealing stage outfits, her stockings, pink bunny ears and unabashed sexual confidence, 23-year-old Miss Grande is a symbol of everything Islamists hate. |
| | + | |
| | + | :According to the purist, medieval interpretation of the Koran favoured by Islamic State, almost everything about Western music, and the Western lifestyle that goes with it, is haram, or forbidden — and so merits a death sentence. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Indeed, one claim of responsibility for Monday's attack stated: 'The explosive devices were detonated in the shameless concert arena.'... |
| | + | |
| | + | :Thus the sight of Ariana Grande and her risqué stage outfits would be anathema to the fanatics... |
| | + | |
| | + | :In 2004, British police secretly recorded a cell of young Islamists discussing a possible attack on a London nightclub, on the basis that no one could 'turn round and say 'Oh, they were innocent', those slags dancing around'. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Likewise, a car bomb parked outside Tiger Tiger nightclub in London's Piccadilly in 2007 seems to have been designed to coincide with a 'ladies' night' at the venue, in which the perpetrators might have hoped to kill and maim scantily clad young women drinking alcohol."[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4535970/JAMES-HARKIN-Ariana-Grande-symbol-Islamists-hate.html] |
| | + | |
| | + | Ariana Grande now has PTSD and some of her fans died. This didn't have to happen.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:41, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :To sum up, I disagree with the decadence that Ariana Grande promotes. On the other hand, I am not for ladies having to wear burkas nor am I pro-Muslim terrorist attacks. It is also apparent that bringing into proximity these two opposite cultures via high amounts of Muslim immigration is a very bad idea given that a very significant proportion of UK/European Muslims are not assimilating into European culture (see: [[Religious immigrants to Europe resistant to secularization]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:10, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::<big>'''Why Mercian and likeminded pro-Muslim immigration Brits are responsible for the Manchester Arena Bombing'''</big>: "European Muslim communities seem to assimilate at different rates and in different ways. A Pew survey from 2006 [http://www.pewresearch.org/2006/08/17/the-frenchmuslim-connection/ found] that 42 percent of French Muslims defined themselves as “French first, Muslim second”—the highest such rate in any of the European countries Pew surveyed. Only 7 percent of British Muslims identified as “British first, Muslim second.” I’ll personally note—and perhaps you’ve shared this experience—that it’s not uncommon to meet people of North African Muslim origin at senior levels of the French security services, something highly uncommon for their counterparts in the United Kingdom."[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/akbar-ahmed-islam-europe/559391/][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:18, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ==== <big>Putting Mercian to the test</big> ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | Mercian wrote: "I do not exchange messages with supporters and sympathisers of Islamic Terrorists. What ever #@#@ you come up with does not disguise that fact. You support Jihad, So Jihadi..[User: Conservative], #@#@# Off" |
| | + | |
| | + | <big>'''Question for Mercian:'''</big> Do you support banning immigration to the UK from Muslim majority countries? |
| | + | |
| | + | According to the 2011 census, in England there were about 2,660,116 Muslims which was 5.02% of the population. No doubt the percentage is higher now given the higher birth rates of Muslims compared their irreligious/nonreligious counterparts who have a sub-replacement rate of fertility. |
| | + | |
| | + | "Islam is the fastest growing religion in the United Kingdom and its adherents have the lowest average age out of all the major religious groups. Between 2001 and 2009, the Muslim population increased almost 10 times faster than the non-Muslim population."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_in_the_United_Kingdom&oldid=936576364] |
| | + | |
| | + | By the way, creationism is growing in Britain thanks to the growth of Islam, Pentecostalism and Evangelical Christianity in Britain. Charles Darwin will never again be on British currency![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:05, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | === Re: the anklebiter Mercian === |
| | + | |
| | + | In response to: |
| | + | |
| | + | :<big>'''Why Mercian and likeminded pro-Muslim immigration Brits are responsible for the Manchester Arena Bombing''':</big> "European Muslim communities seem to assimilate at different rates and in different ways. A Pew survey from 2006 found that 42 percent of French Muslims defined themselves as “French first, Muslim second”—the highest such rate in any of the European countries Pew surveyed. Only 7 percent of British Muslims identified as “British first, Muslim second.” I’ll personally note—and perhaps you’ve shared this experience—that it’s not uncommon to meet people of North African Muslim origin at senior levels of the French security services, something highly uncommon for their counterparts in the United Kingdom."[46]Conservative (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | '''Mercian wrote:''' "That Sir, is libel. When Alex Jones expressed similar views on Sandy Hook the lawsuit almost ruined him, and I am guessing he is a man of vastly more resources than you.--Mercian (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)" |
| | + | |
| | + | Vox Day wrote concerning anklebiters: |
| | + | |
| | + | {{quotebox|Anklebiters are: |
| | + | |
| | + | *0 to +1 SD intellect |
| | + | |
| | + | *Mildly autistic at the least, which leads them to overestimate their own intellect. |
| | + | |
| | + | *Far more hurt by a mix of dialectic and rhetoric rather than pure rhetoric (they innately believe themselves above it) or pure dialectic (they'll just retreat to appeals of authority). |
| | + | |
| | + | For efficacy in pain, the mix of dialectic and rhetoric will probably depend on the level of autism in particular. |
| | + | |
| | + | The only thing I haven't figured out in this theory is the best way to handle said anklebiters. Ignoring them certainly works, as they're just self-styled intellectual tough-guys walking around with a chip on their shoulders. It certainly seems to serve to frustrate their efforts on that end. But anklebiters can look like an expert to the average stranger, and indeed seems to spend their time trying to convince everyone around them that they are an expert, so it may serve in everyone's best interest to nip that problem in the bud. How, I do not know. Domestication training, using dialectic/rhetoric mixes as the stick? |
| | + | |
| | + | Anklebiters are a brain-damaged form of midwit. They are almost always atheist, further pointing towards the atypical neurological profile required for that, they are usually male, and they tend to be unexpectedly poorly educated and badly read despite their observable intelligence. Most importantly, they lack the normal ability to admit failure, back up, and start over that normal individuals possess. And lacking it, they therefore lack any ability to improve their arguments or even to question any of their adopted beliefs.[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/02/mailvox-dealing-with-anklebiters.html] }} |
| | + | |
| | + | Mercian is not an atheist, but he is close to being an atheist as he is an [[agnosticism|agnostic]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | I would say at this point that Mercian's intellect is 0 to +1 SD intellect at best. The absurdity of someone from another country who uses a username/pseudonym threatening to sue someone for libel leads me to the conclusion that Mercian does not possess a high intellect. |
| | + | |
| | + | Since Mercian appears to be a classic, midwit anklebiter, the best course of action at this point is to follow Vox Day's advice and ignore him. |
| | + | ::Sounds like a good idea. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:10, 31 January 2020 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | "The difference between the mid-wit and the genuinely intelligent is usually fairly easy to identify. The mid-witted individual tends to compare himself to those below the average and concludes that because he isn't like them, he must be a genius." - Vox Day.[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/02/tragedy-of-mid-witted.html][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:14, 31 January 2020 (EST) |