| Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| | A year later Deputy Attorney General [[Rod Rosenstein]] indicted [[The indictment of 12 Russian nationals, 13 July 2018|12 Russian nationals]], who would never stand trial, to restart the myth of Russian hacking the DNC. The indictment was intended to cover-up the [[corrupt]] activities of the Obama DOJ and Democrats as their [[collusion]] with Russia was exposed. | | A year later Deputy Attorney General [[Rod Rosenstein]] indicted [[The indictment of 12 Russian nationals, 13 July 2018|12 Russian nationals]], who would never stand trial, to restart the myth of Russian hacking the DNC. The indictment was intended to cover-up the [[corrupt]] activities of the Obama DOJ and Democrats as their [[collusion]] with Russia was exposed. |
| | | | |
| − | ==U.S. indictment== | + | ===U.S. indictment=== |
| | On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia [[EDVA]]. The indictment was under seal since March 6th, 2018.<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/405930233/Julian-Assange-Indictment</ref> | | On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia [[EDVA]]. The indictment was under seal since March 6th, 2018.<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/405930233/Julian-Assange-Indictment</ref> |
| | | | |
| Line 79: |
Line 79: |
| | | | |
| | This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the [[CIA]], FBI, [[DOJ]], O[[DNI]] and U.K intelligence apparatus.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/why-john-brennan-peter-strzok-and-doj-needed-julian-assange-arrested-and-why-uk-officials-obliged/#more-175242</ref> | | This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the [[CIA]], FBI, [[DOJ]], O[[DNI]] and U.K intelligence apparatus.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/why-john-brennan-peter-strzok-and-doj-needed-julian-assange-arrested-and-why-uk-officials-obliged/#more-175242</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Cover=up=== |
| | + | The January 7, 2017, ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' (ICA) alleged that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump. In its most essential form the ICA was the justification for “[[Spygate]]” i.e. [[Crossfire Hurricane]] and all of the preceding intelligence surveillance upon the Trump campaign. The ICA was the brain-trust of [[John Brennan]], [[James Clapper]] and [[James Comey]]. While the majority of content was from the [[CIA]], some of the content within the ICA was written by FBI Agent [[Peter Strzok]] who held a unique “insurance policy” interest in how the report could be utilized in 2017. [[NSA Director Mike Rogers]] would not sign up to the “high confidence” claims because he saw through the political motives of the report. |
| | + | |
| | + | (JUNE 2019 – New York Times) […] Mr. Barr wants to know more about the C.I.A. sources who helped inform its understanding of the details of the Russian interference campaign, an official has said. He also wants to better understand the intelligence that flowed from the C.I.A. to the F.B.I. in the summer of 2016. |
| | + | |
| | + | During the final weeks of the Obama administration, the intelligence community released a declassified assessment that concluded that Mr. Putin ordered an influence campaign that “aspired to help” Mr. Trump’s electoral chances by damaging Mrs. Clinton’s. The C.I.A. and the F.B.I. reported they had high confidence in the conclusion. The National Security Agency, which conducts electronic surveillance, had a moderate degree of confidence. (read more) |
| | + | |
| | + | Questioning the construct of the ICA is a smart direction to take for a Durham review or investigation. By looking at the intelligence community work-product, Durham could cut through a lot of the chatter and get to the heart of |
| | + | |
| | + | U.S. Attorney [[John Durham]] investigated Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Strzok's motives. All of the downstream claims about Russian activity, including the [[Mueller show trials|Russian indictments promoted by Rosenstein and the Mueller team]], are centered around origination claims of illicit Russian activity outlined in the ICA. This is exactly why actors within the DOJ, FBI and [[Intelligence Community]] needed to throw a bag over Julian Assange. |
| | + | |
| | + | Assange could expose a complicit [[conspiracy]] between corrupt U.S. intelligence actors and a host of political interests who created a fraudulent Russia-collusion conspiracy with the central component of Russia “hacking” the DNC. If Assange were not controlled, he could show he received the DNC emails from a [[leak]]er, and not from a hack, the central component of the Russia interference narrative would collapse. The DOJ decision to target Assange protected multiple U.S. agencies and [[Robert Mueller]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | As soon as Robert Mueller released his Russia report, the [[EDVA]] shut down Assange with the DOJ indictment; in a similar way the same DOJ shut down [[James Wolfe]] with a plea agreement. |
| | | | |
| | == Reactions== | | == Reactions== |