| Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| | A year later Deputy Attorney General [[Rod Rosenstein]] indicted [[The indictment of 12 Russian nationals, 13 July 2018|12 Russian nationals]], who would never stand trial, to restart the myth of Russian hacking the DNC. The indictment was intended to cover-up the [[corrupt]] activities of the Obama DOJ and Democrats as their [[collusion]] with Russia was exposed. | | A year later Deputy Attorney General [[Rod Rosenstein]] indicted [[The indictment of 12 Russian nationals, 13 July 2018|12 Russian nationals]], who would never stand trial, to restart the myth of Russian hacking the DNC. The indictment was intended to cover-up the [[corrupt]] activities of the Obama DOJ and Democrats as their [[collusion]] with Russia was exposed. |
| | | | |
| − | ===Cover=up=== | + | ===DOJ Cover-up=== |
| | The January 7, 2017, ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' (ICA) alleged that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump. In its most essential form the ICA was the justification for “[[Spygate]]” i.e. [[Crossfire Hurricane]] and all of the preceding intelligence surveillance upon the Trump campaign. The ICA was the brain-trust of [[John Brennan]], [[James Clapper]] and [[James Comey]]. While the majority of content was from the [[CIA]], some of the content within the ICA was written by FBI Agent [[Peter Strzok]] who held a unique “insurance policy” interest in how the report could be utilized in 2017. [[NSA Director Mike Rogers]] would not sign up to the “high confidence” claims because he saw through the political motives of the report. | | The January 7, 2017, ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' (ICA) alleged that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump. In its most essential form the ICA was the justification for “[[Spygate]]” i.e. [[Crossfire Hurricane]] and all of the preceding intelligence surveillance upon the Trump campaign. The ICA was the brain-trust of [[John Brennan]], [[James Clapper]] and [[James Comey]]. While the majority of content was from the [[CIA]], some of the content within the ICA was written by FBI Agent [[Peter Strzok]] who held a unique “insurance policy” interest in how the report could be utilized in 2017. [[NSA Director Mike Rogers]] would not sign up to the “high confidence” claims because he saw through the political motives of the report. |
| | | | |
| Line 65: |
Line 65: |
| | | | |
| | As soon as Robert Mueller released his Russia report, the [[EDVA]] shut down Assange with the DOJ indictment; in a similar way the same DOJ shut down [[James Wolfe]] with a plea agreement. | | As soon as Robert Mueller released his Russia report, the [[EDVA]] shut down Assange with the DOJ indictment; in a similar way the same DOJ shut down [[James Wolfe]] with a plea agreement. |
| | + | |
| | + | ===U.S. indictment=== |
| | + | On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the Eastern District of Virginia [[EDVA]]. The indictment was under seal since March 6th, 2018.<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/405930233/Julian-Assange-Indictment</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | On Tuesday April 15th more investigative material was released.The indictment has a Grand Jury date of December of 2017. The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where [[Dana Boente]] was U.S. Attorney at the time. The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after [[Mueller probe]] ended in April 2019. |
| | + | |
| | + | The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman [[Dana Rohrabacher]] talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.” John Solomon reported, |
| | + | {{Quotebox|Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future. |
| | + | |
| | + | Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the [[WikiLeaks]] founder has been holed up for years. |
| | + | |
| | + | Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to ''[[The Hill]]''. |
| | + | |
| | + | “Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.” |
| | + | |
| | + | Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with [[President Trump]].<ref>https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/346904-assange-meets-us-congressman-vows-to-prove-russia-did-not-leak-him</ref>}} |
| | + | The [[FBI]] took keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange and quickly gathered specific evidence related to Wikileaks and [[Bradley Manning]] for a grand jury by December 2017. Within three months the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe ended. |
| | + | |
| | + | On April 11th, 2019, a planned and coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed. The Mueller report was dependent on [[fake news]] allegations OF Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes. |
| | + | |
| | + | The Mueller report claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements. |
| | + | |
| | + | The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the [[2016 presidential election]]. The fulcrum for this Russia interference claim is [[John Brennan]]'s early January 2017 ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' (ICA); and the ICA claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers; a claim only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from [[Crowdstrike]], a DNC contractor. |
| | + | |
| | + | The CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim. The FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining that claim. All of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with Brennan and [[Peter Strzok]] also have a vested self-interest in maintaining the Russia hacking narrative. |
| | + | |
| | + | Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack. |
| | + | |
| | + | This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the [[CIA]], FBI, [[DOJ]], O[[DNI]] and U.K intelligence apparatus.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/11/03/why-john-brennan-peter-strzok-and-doj-needed-julian-assange-arrested-and-why-uk-officials-obliged/#more-175242</ref> |
| | | | |
| | == Reactions== | | == Reactions== |