Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 16:
Line 16: − You can't be unbiased and Conservative, and you can't be unbiased and Liberal. What we need is a wiki with a TRULY NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW... Conservapedia is fine for Conservatives, but you HAVE to acknowledge it's biased. It calls Obama, "arguably the worst President in US history". Basically the whole "Athiesm" article is arguments against Atheism (some of them are irrational, but others are perhaps more logical). I'm not trying to be anti-Conservative, or (shudder) Liberal, but if you're going to have a wiki based on a political ideology, you can't exactly remain neutral, can you? Of course, it depends what you mean by "bias". As some people have said, if you biased "in favour of good things" then it's fine to be biased. And if you're sure you're right, then it's not so much bias but fact. At least, that's your opinion.
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 05:39, March 3, 2020
, 05:39, March 3, 2020Reverted edits by Barrymore12 (talk) to last revision by RaymondZ
I can't believe this is a debate topic! Look to the upper left hand corner of this web page. See it? "Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." Bias would not make it trustworthy or a good encyclopedia! Need I say more?--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 02:10, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
I can't believe this is a debate topic! Look to the upper left hand corner of this web page. See it? "Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia." Bias would not make it trustworthy or a good encyclopedia! Need I say more?--[[User:JArneal|JArneal]] 02:10, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
==Yes==
==Yes==