105
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 290:
Line 290: + +
→Why the reversion on the "Jesus Christ" article?
: I could think that 2+2=6, but that does not make it true. Conservapedia presents the truth first. If you would like to add a section to the bottom about how Jews do not accept Jesus as the Son of God then go ahaid. Thanks, [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 15:37, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
: I could think that 2+2=6, but that does not make it true. Conservapedia presents the truth first. If you would like to add a section to the bottom about how Jews do not accept Jesus as the Son of God then go ahaid. Thanks, [[User:CPWebmaster|CPWebmaster]] 15:37, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
::I was under the impression that Conservapedia presented the ''facts'' first, not any given religion. Stating blankly that Jesus is the Son of God is a pretty darn unsupported assertion, isn't it? Isn't the whole point of faith-based religion that we'll find out for sure after death?--[[User:M|M]] 17:27, 15 May 2007 (EDT)