Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
added "see also"
An inversion holds that if ''X'' happened and then ''Y'' did not happen, ''X'' was unnecessary to prevent ''Y'' because ''Y'' would not have happened regardless. Both this inversion and the regular version of the fallacy are fallacious because they ignore the difference between causation and coincidence.
An inversion holds that if ''X'' happened and then ''Y'' did not happen, ''X'' was unnecessary to prevent ''Y'' because ''Y'' would not have happened regardless. Both this inversion and the regular version of the fallacy are fallacious because they ignore the difference between causation and coincidence.
==See also==
*[[Affirming the consequent]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]